Njegovan disappointed that only five teams allowed to apply for pregnancy exemption

With three members of Team Lawes trying to balance pregnancy with curling at times this season, Selena Njegovan was pleased her squad received an exemption to add an out-of-province replacement player for the national championship.

What was disappointing, Njegovan said, was that only the top five teams in the national rankings were allowed to apply.

The Curling Canada decision to limit eligibility for a pregnancy exemption at the Scotties Tournament of Hearts has been a hot topic since the draw was released this week.

“It’s just not fair to the other women and the other teams,” Njegovan said from Winnipeg.

Njegovan said that from the start of her team’s interactions with Curling Canada on the subject, her rink maintained that all teams — regardless of ranking — should be eligible.

But in a Tuesday news release to unveil the Scotties rosters and schedule, Curling Canada said only top-five teams could apply for the exemption to bring in a replacement free agent. The organization said it was “because their ability to replace a player with someone with an equal level of ability and commitment is limited.”

Backlash was swift, with several high-profile members of the curling community criticizing the decision.

The organization did make a change late Thursday by saying that all teams could apply for an exemption at the national playdowns, but only starting in 2024.

“Right away I thought, ‘This needs to happen now,'” two-time Olympian Dawn McEwen said Friday. “Just for the principle of the whole thing. Just to make it right.”

Organization brass — who maintain that it’s a “residency exemption” despite the wording in their release — said that since teams have already played down and named lineups, it was too late to make a change for the 2023 Scotties.

“It was meant to be in addition to an already progressive pregnancy and parental leave policy,” Curling Canada CEO Kathy Henderson said on a Thursday video call. “There was a lot of nuance in it because we certainly in no way, shape or form want to be discriminatory.

“What we’re trying to make sure is that we are balancing off the needs of funded athletes to be able to get themselves on to the podium with residency requirements that are part of an interprovincial and inter-territory competition.”

The Scotties is set to begin Feb. 17 in Kamloops, B.C.

“I know that it’s for the greater good that if we can get everyone this exemption, it is worth it to go through this,” Njegovan said. “It is nice to see that Curling Canada has extended it next year to all teams.

“It’s been tough but the girls and our team are supportive of each other and we’ve been there for each other for everything that’s been going on. We’re just rolling with the punches now.”

Njegovan said the team first reached out to Curling Canada after she went public with her pregnancy last year. When told in late December that there would be a top-five cutoff, they voiced their opinion that it was unfair.

Trending Now

“We want it to be for all women, which we reiterated from the beginning,” she said. “But they stuck with the five teams rule.”

Lawes, a wild-card entry, is ranked No. 4 in Canada. The 13 teams in the Scotties field that were outside the top five were unable to apply for the same exemption.

Under residency rules, at least three of four players on a team must live or have birthright status in their respective province or territory. Only one free agent is allowed unless an exemption is granted.

Pregnancies are quite common on the curling scene, especially in the first year of a quadrennial. The sixth-ranked team skipped by Casey Scheidegger, for example, has two pregnant players on its roster but just missed the top-five cut.

“It’s really disappointing to me that Curling Canada is not supporting all of their athletes,” McEwen told The Canadian Press. “It’s like we’re making these rules and (for) all these women who are pregnant or trying to get pregnant, it’s hard.

“We should be supporting our athletes and we shouldn’t be restricting them from opportunities. Everyone should have an equal opportunity.”

Njegovan, who’s due in late March, called the developments part of a “gruelling process.”

“Obviously they need to do their due diligence too and see what the association as a whole can do to make it fair for everyone,” she said. “Unfortunately it didn’t come out to be fair for everyone.”

Making matters worse for Njegovan, who has been cleared to travel, came news that she’d have limited in-venue access if she decides to attend the competition at Sandman Centre.

In a Twitter post Monday announcing that Laura Walker would be filling in, Team Lawes said it planned to have Njegovan on site in a support role alongside coach Lisa Weagle.

However, the Curling Canada news release a day later — in an unusually specific mention — said that Njegovan was “not expected to travel to Kamloops.”

“Unfortunately we didn’t see that coming at all until we read the (release) saying I wasn’t going to be there,” Njegovan said. “So we were a little confused ourselves, so we reached out to them again and got an answer — after following up multiple times — saying I couldn’t be on the bench with the girls.”

Team Lawes originally planned for Njegovan to watch games from ice level, come out for timeouts and help the team during practice sessions.

“I can come and sit in the stands but I can’t sit on the bench,” she said, adding the decision was “very upsetting.”

Njegovan added she hasn’t seen any rules or documents from Curling Canada regarding team involvement at the nationals when a player is on pregnancy leave.

“We can’t find it anywhere,” she said. “We’ve spoken to some lawyers as well and they don’t see it in the policy either. So I don’t really know where it’s coming from.”

Curling Canada said Friday that since Njegovan is on pregnancy leave, she won’t have access to the field of play or coach area. The organization also supplied a line from its pregnancy/parental leave policy.

“When an athlete submits a request to Curling Canada and if their request is granted, their team must then submit an application to replace the athlete for up to eight weeks,” it said.

Kyle Jahns, Curling Canada’s communication and media relations manager, said the document doesn’t make specific mention to access, but does “indicate that the athlete is being replaced for that period of time.”

“During that period of pregnancy/parental leave, the player is not an active member of the team,” he said in an email.

Jahns added that Njegovan would be provided with a general venue accreditation if she decides to attend and is welcome to participate in off-ice activities.

“Obviously the girls make me feel like I’m part of the team but it’s going to feel a lot different if I’m sitting in the stands acting basically as a fan,” Njegovan said.

“So that’s just something that I need to decide — if I still want to go or not.”