Eisai Co Ltd and Biogen Inc on Tuesday said their experimental Alzheimer’s drug significantly slowed cognitive and functional decline in a large trial of patients in the early stages of the disease, marking a rare win in a field littered with failed drugs.
The drug, lecanemab, slowed progress of the brain-wasting disease by 27% compared with a placebo, meeting the study’s main goal, and potentially offering hope for patients and their families desperate for an effective treatment.
“It’s not a huge effect, but it’s a positive effect,” said Ronald Petersen, director of the Mayo Clinic Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center in Rochester, Minnesota.
The race to stem the progression of Alzheimer’s comes as the number of Americans living with the disease is expected to roughly double to 13 million by 2050, according to the Alzheimer’s Association.
Globally, the figure could reach 139 million by 2050 without an effective treatment, Alzheimer’s Disease International said.
Shares of Eisai jumped 17% to the daily limit in Tokyo, while Biogen shares were up 46% in premarket trading.
Eisai, leader of the 50-50 partnership’s lecanemab program, is seeking FDA approval under an accelerated pathway, with a decision expected in early January.
Eisai is aiming for full approval and commercialization of the drug in the United States, Europe, and Japan by the end of 2023, CEO Haruo Naito told reporters in Tokyo.
The company said results from the 1,800-patient trial prove the longstanding theory that removal of sticky deposits of a protein called amyloid beta from the brains of people with early Alzheimer’s can delay advance of the debilitating disease.
The lecanemab data suggest “a potentially new multi-billion dollar franchise,” Jefferies analyst Michael Yee said in a research note.
‘VERY EARLY DAYS’
Lecanemab, like the partners’ previous drug Aduhelm, is an intravenous antibody designed to remove amyloid deposits. Unlike Aduhelm, lecanemab targets forms of amyloid that have not yet clumped together.
“If you can slow a disease by almost 30% that’s fantastic,” said Dr Jeff Cummings, director of the Chambers-Grundy Center for Transformative Neuroscience at the University of Nevada Las Vegas.
The so-called amyloid hypothesis has been challenged by some scientists, particularly after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s controversial approval of Aduhelm in 2021 based on its plaque-clearing ability rather than proof that it helped slow cognitive decline. The decision came after the FDA’s own panel of outside experts had advised against approval.
While the top-line results for lecanemab are convincing, it’s still “very early days” in determining whether the effects are clinically meaningful, said Dr Kristian Steen Frederiksen, director of a clinical trial unit at the University of Copenhagen.
Alzheimer’s “is an extremely complex disease and amyloid-related pathology is unlikely to be the only player,” he said. “Therefore targeting a single target is not likely to produce large effect sizes.”
Aduhelm was the first new Alzheimer’s drug approved in 20 years after a long list of high-profile failures for the industry.
Patient advocacy groups hailed the news of positive lecanemab trial results.
“I would hope that the FDA approves the drug in January,” USAgainstAlzheimer’s Chairman George Vradenburg said.
The Phase III trial evaluated the drug’s ability to reduce cognitive and functional decline based on the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), a numerical scale used to quantify the severity of dementia in patients in areas such as memory, orientation, judgment and problem solving and personal care.
BRAIN SWELLING
The rate of a brain swelling side effect associated with anti-amyloid treatments was 12.5% in the lecanemab group, versus 1.7% in the placebo group. But many cases did not cause symptoms, with symptomatic brain swelling seen in 2.8% of those in the lecanemab group, the companies said.
Micro hemorrhages in the brain occurred at a rate of 17% in the lecanemab group, and 8.7% in the placebo group.
Petersen said the side effect rate was much less than with Aduhelm and “certainly tolerable.”
Aduhelm’s approval was a rare bright spot for Alzheimer’s patients, but critics have called for more evidence that amyloid-targeting drugs are worth the cost.
The controversy and reluctance by some payers to cover Aduhelm led Biogen to slash the drug’s price to $28,000 per year from an initial $56,000.
Medicare, the U.S. government health plan for people 65 and older, said this year it would only pay for Aduhelm and other similar drugs if patients were enrolled in a valid clinical trial, which sharply curtailed the medication’s use.
Michael Irizarry, Eisai’s deputy chief clinical officer, said on a conference call that the company will have discussions with Medicare about coverage of lecanemab.
(Reuters)