Oops, this is what the New York Times recently said, "How Republicans are 'weaponizing' public office to oppose climate action." }, depicting the evil conspiracy of Republican state treasurers to "use government power and public money to punish corporations seeking to reduce greenhouse gases."
Yes, many Republican officials are fighting back against progressive moves to "use government power and public money" to destroy the carbon-based fuel industry. same end. The Republican Party is working with think tanks, nonprofits, and others on this effort.
Exactly what the Democrats have been doing on the side for a long time. For starters, New York City and state regulatorsboastandanti-carbon strategies to invest in huge pension funds. So do other Democrats in similar jobs across the country.
Uh,Mike Bloomberg is going to the state attorney general's office to fund a task force to sueoil, gas and coal companies. Sending millions of dollars. This is more an affront to good government than anything the Times has revealed.
Left-handers generally admire the use of governmental power for their own ends. Whether it's the questionable anti-carbon use of pension funds and such, or all the ridiculous "state travel bans" that have taken. In recent years, school transbus policies have largely targeted other states not along the progressive line.
California Governor Gavin Newsom said: I told Hollywood they should stop filming in politically incorrect states. (The Ozarks, when the series ended, were lucky.) The
Times prejudice is breathtakingly ignorant: reporters and editors are criticized for their serious financial Doesn't seem to be aware of governance debates and such. } The urge to “make companies disclose their climate risks” – in effect, this is an attempt to force companies to operate on the assumption that the most extreme climate change scenarios are certain,Ignore the best-caseclimate science actually says.
By the way, ifnothingis done about global warming, the earth will warm by a few degrees and sea levels will rise a little... would be in much better shape than.
Climate change is not devastating at all, and treating it as such will cause serious harm (just fill up the tank for a quick taste). . Moreover, while the West as a whole may be carbon neutral by 2030,it still does not prevent global emissions from hitting what the Greens call a disaster. On board: They are building a coal-fired power plant early.
However, mention of these facts is prohibited.
Because of their ignorance, The Times' reporters and editors remain ignorant of domestic politics as well.A new violation of national norms.