Article author:
Judge of Louisiana Temporary state due to the US Supreme Court enacting a Republican-backed law banning abortion set to come into force after a blockbuster decision to terminate constitutional rights to national proceedings on Monday Blocked to.
Louisiana is one of 13 states with a "trigger law" designed to ban or severely limit abortion after the Supreme Court overturned the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling. .. On Friday.
Judge Robin Jarussso of the Orleans Parish Civil District Court immediately after the Hope Medical Group for Women in Shreveport, one of three Louisiana abortions. , Has issued a temporary injunction to prevent Louisiana from implementing the banhttps://tmsnrt.rs/3OEBEbGクリニック、訴えた。
The clinic has issued a ban on three trigger laws in Louisiana, which is a legitimate procedure under the State Constitution. He infringed his rights and claimed that he "lacked the constitutional safeguards necessary to prevent arbitrary enforcement."
The Reproductive Rights Center, which filed a proceeding on behalf of the clinic, said abortion treatment is now being resumed in the state after Jarusso's order. The judge set up a hearing on July 8 and decided whether to further prevent the enforcement of the ban.
Republican Attorney General Jeff Landry did not respond to requests for comment. He welcomed Friday's Supreme Court ruling, saying at one event that those who challenged the state's ban were "fighting fiercely."
This proceeding is one of several Republican-backed and challenging abortion laws under the post-Constitution of the United States Supreme Court.
A parent-child relationship Utah branch planned on Saturday appeals for a ban on triggers in the state, and abortion advocates plan to challenge the ban on abortion in Ohio six weeks after it went into effect on Friday. I have.
In Louisiana, Hope Medical, by state law, does exactly what it does, such as whether one or all of them are collectively valid, and if there are exceptions. He claimed that it was impossible to determine if it was banned. Save the life of a pregnant woman.
Due to the ambiguity, state and local officials issued conflicting statements as to whether the trigger ban was effective, alleging a proceeding in the Orleans Civil District Court.
(Report by Natleymond in Boston, edited by Bill Burke)
