NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Baltimore Archbishop William Lorithanked the overthrow of the Roe v. Wade case on Friday and called it a "historical ruling."
Lori celebrates the result, saying that the end of theconstitutional abortionis what he and others have been hoping to see for decades. I did.
But Lori also reveals that the road to a better society is not over yet, and churches, pro-life voters and conservative politicians are now stepping up to ensure health. I said it was necessary.Safety for all pregnant women.
"It gives us the opportunity to build a new culture of life and re-engage with our fellow citizens," Lori told the Vatican press. "And it is also a challenge for us to serve difficult pregnant women and double their efforts to protect both mothers and children. This is what we are very enthusiastic about.
Live Update: Supreme Court Roe v. Wade Judgment
"The Church has a tremendous network There is a United States that is ready, willing, and able to do this, and in fact has already done it and has done it for decades, "Lori said.
File-Archbishop William Lori, Baltimore 2019 Say hello to the parishioners after a Sunday Mass at the Catholic Church of the Holy Family in Randallstown, Maryland on July 14, 2014. (Mary F. Culvert of the Washington Post by Getty Images)
The Archdiocese of Baltimore was the first Catholic parish in the United States.., and the Archbishop of Baltimore, is often regarded as the "first" diocese of equality because of the historical importance of its position.
"We have a stable affection for women in difficult situations, unborn children, and children who give birth and simply provide in church and society. I think it has to be a muffled voice. A witness of love and service for the culture around here. "
Here to get the FOX News app Click
Catholics continue to undertake cases that could overturn federal policy, where the Supreme Court is in a position to justify social issues.
Friday, June 24, outside the Supreme Court Celebration, 2022, in Washington. (AP Photo / Steve Helber)
Supreme Court Clarence Thomasoverthrows Roe v. Wade Aftermath.
"In the future, we need to revisit all the precedents of this court's substantive due process, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell," Thomas agrees. It is written in 89}. "Because the substantive due process decision is" obviously wrong ", [...] there is an obligation to" correct "the error established in these cases.
Griswold vs. Connecticut was a milestone in 1965, and the use of contraception between two married people was a privacy issue and was constitutionally protected.
The 2003 Lawrence v. Texas case dealt with gay sex between consenting parties, and Obergefell v. Hodges trampled on the same territory in 2015,constitutionally making gay marriages. Ruled as a protected right to privacy.
