In a case that has sparked controversy and misinformation, a British couple was recently imprisoned for their involvement in violent anti-immigration riots in Stoke-on-Trent, not for chanting slogans as some social media posts have erroneously claimed. The incident, which occurred approximately 13 months ago, highlights the complex interplay between social unrest, misinformation, and the justice system.
Ciaran Lockett, 34, and his partner Deana Evans, 32, were convicted for their roles in the disorder that erupted in Stoke-on-Trent, a city known for its rich pottery heritage and a population of around 256,000. The unrest was triggered by false online claims about a Muslim immigrant allegedly murdering three young girls in Southport, a coastal town in Merseyside, England.
Following their sentencing about 12.5 months ago, misleading posts circulated on social media platforms, suggesting that Lockett and Evans were jailed merely for chanting slogans. One comment on a widely-viewed post stated, "Rape someone and walk away. Shout the wrong slogan and rot in jail. The UK is becoming an evil dictatorship." However, these claims grossly misrepresent the actual charges and circumstances of their imprisonment.
According to Staffordshire Police, established in 1842 and responsible for maintaining law and order in the region, Lockett received a 32-month jail sentence for violent disorder. Evans was sentenced to 20 months in prison for violent disorder and common assault of an emergency worker. These charges fall under the Public Order Act 1986 and the more recent legislation that made assaulting an emergency worker a specific offense in 2018.
A police spokesperson detailed the couple's actions during the riots: "Both Lockett and Evans were seen actively participating in violent disorder. Both were obstructing a police vehicle on blue lights and had to be physically moved." The spokesperson added that Evans was aggressive towards officers and present in crowds that assaulted police personnel, while Lockett assaulted several officers and threw missiles at both the public and police.
It's worth noting that violent disorder carries a maximum sentence of five years' imprisonment in England and Wales, while assaulting an emergency worker can result in up to 12 months in jail. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), the principal public agency for conducting criminal prosecutions in England and Wales since its establishment by the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, confirmed the couple's involvement in multiple aspects of the disorder.
Both Lockett and Evans pleaded guilty to the charges and expressed remorse through their defense barrister during court proceedings. This case underscores the serious consequences of participating in violent civil unrest, which has been increasingly linked to misinformation spread on social media platforms globally.
The incident also reflects broader tensions related to immigration in the UK, which has seen a rise in anti-immigration sentiment in recent years. Stoke-on-Trent, which voted 69.4% in favor of Brexit in the 2016 referendum, has faced economic challenges since the decline of its traditional industries, potentially contributing to social tensions.
In conclusion, the imprisonment of Ciaran Lockett and Deana Evans was not for chanting slogans, but for their active and violent participation in the riots. This case serves as a reminder of the importance of fact-checking and the potential consequences of spreading misinformation, especially in an era where social media can rapidly amplify false narratives.