Balancing Efficiency and Sensitivity in Sexual Abuse MDLs

Multidistrict litigation in sexual abuse cases requires careful consideration. While consolidation offers efficiency, lawyers must prioritize client welfare, ensuring each survivor's unique circumstances are addressed.

September 5 2024, 02:12 PM  •  555 views

Balancing Efficiency and Sensitivity in Sexual Abuse MDLs

In the complex landscape of modern litigation, the consolidation of lawsuits into multidistrict litigation (MDL) has become a significant topic, particularly in sexual abuse cases. As of September 5, 2024, legal professionals are grappling with the delicate balance between efficiency and individual client care in these sensitive matters.

MDL, created by Congress in 1968, aims to streamline the legal process for cases involving numerous claims from similarly harmed plaintiffs. While the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) has created over 2,800 MDLs since its inception, the application of this process to sexual abuse cases requires careful consideration.

The benefits of consolidation are clear: improved efficiency and a coordinated approach to common issues. However, attorneys must exercise caution to avoid a "one-size-fits-all" strategy that could overlook the unique circumstances of each survivor's trauma. This is particularly crucial given that the average MDL takes about three years to resolve, during which time clients may feel marginalized or re-traumatized if their individual needs are not met.

Philip Federico, a partner at Baird Mandalas Brockstedt & Federico LLC, emphasizes the importance of sensitivity to client needs:

Ensuring that every voice is heard and considered is paramount.

This approach is especially relevant in cases involving institutions like the Catholic Church, where abuse incidents vary in time, location, and specific circumstances. As of 2024, the Church has paid over $4 billion in settlements related to sexual abuse cases, highlighting the scale and complexity of these litigations.

When considering damages in MDLs, attorneys face unique challenges. While a damages matrix may be suitable for some cases, others may require a case-specific allocation process to ensure justice for each survivor. This complexity is compounded when organizations file for bankruptcy, as seen with the Archdiocese of Baltimore in 2023.

Bankruptcy filings can shift cases to bankruptcy courts, altering the traditional litigation process. Under Chapter 11, established in 1978, the court sets parameters for recovery and creates a trust for claimants. This shift can be particularly challenging for survivors, who may feel that economic considerations are overshadowing their pursuit of truth and justice.

To mitigate these challenges, regular client communication is crucial. Attorneys should provide frequent updates, maintain clear communication channels, and actively listen to client concerns. This approach aligns with trauma-informed legal practices, which gained prominence in the early 2000s.

All staff involved in these cases should receive proper trauma training, adhering to the medical ethics principle of "Do No Further Harm." This ensures a safe space for clients and minimizes the risk of re-traumatization during case discussions.

As the legal system continues to evolve, with approximately 30% of all civil cases in federal courts being part of MDLs in 2023, the decision to consolidate sexual abuse cases remains complex. Attorneys must carefully weigh the benefits of streamlined processes against the need to prioritize each survivor's unique circumstances. This balance is essential not only for the success of MDL proceedings but, more importantly, for the well-being of the clients they serve.