A driver who beat a woman and three young daughters to death in Brampton, Ontario two years ago has challenged a conviction for a drug-impaired driving fee and sentence. ..
In a notice of appeal filed last month,Brady Robertson'slawyer stated that the judge was constitutional in Canadian law that set legal limits on THC blood levels. Claims that it was wrong to support. drive.
According to the notice, Robertson has declared the section of the law relating to THC blood levels invalid and demands that his conviction for driving disability be revoked.
Robertson, 22, was sentenced to 17 years in prison in May and deducted nearly three years of credit for his time already in prison. He has also been banned from driving for 20 years after his release.
Read more: An Ontario driver killed a woman and her three daughters were sentenced to 17 years in prison.
The story continues under the advertisement
Robertson and Carolina Siasullo in connection with the June 18, 2020 crash. He was found guilty of four dangerous driving charges that killed his daughters Clara, Lilianna, and Mira. He is 6 and 1 year old.
However, he pleaded not guilty to four acquittals while being killed by drugs, and his lawyer challenged the constitutionality of the law on driving with drug disorders. I did.
Trend Story
During the trial, Judge Sandra Caponecchia of the Ontario State Court said that Robertson's blood THC concentration was blood. We found it to be 40 nanograms per milliliter. Approximately 45 minutes after the crash, this is eight times the legal limit.
The constitutional objection was dismissed earlier this year and convicted of impairing driving charges. Robertson was also convicted of dangerous driving in another collision on June 16, 2020.
Read more:The Ontario driver who killed the woman and her three children apologize for his actions
Robertson is also seeking a vacation to sue his ruling, claiming in a notice that what was imposed was "ineligible and overly harsh." The document also alleges Caponecchia who made the mistake by ignoring precedent principles in sentencing.
The judge who made the mistake in finding the principle of detention, which states that this document should be subject to the least stringent but rational judgment, was "young and indigenous. He claims that he did not "play a role in the judgment."
The story continues below the ad
It argues that sentences should be reduced to "appropriate" ones.
Robertson's lawyer did not immediately respond to the request for comment.
© 2022 TheCanadian Press
