Bahrain Fails to Block Lawsuit by Dissidents in UK Hacking Case

UK Court of Appeal rejects Bahrain's state immunity claim in a lawsuit by two dissidents alleging computer hacking. The ruling allows the case to proceed, challenging Bahrain's denial of surveillance activities.

October 4 2024, 09:16 AM  •  340 views

Bahrain Fails to Block Lawsuit by Dissidents in UK Hacking Case

In a significant legal development, the UK Court of Appeal has ruled against Bahrain's attempt to claim state immunity in a lawsuit brought by two dissidents. The case, which centers on allegations of computer hacking, has drawn attention to the ongoing tensions between the Gulf state and its critics.

Saeed Shehabi and Moosa Mohammed, the plaintiffs in this case, assert that Bahrain infiltrated their computers using a surveillance program called FinSpy. This software allegedly allowed government agents to gain control of their laptops, access files, and monitor communications. Bahrain, however, vehemently denies these accusations.

The ruling, delivered on Friday, October 4, 2024, upholds a previous decision by the High Court in 2023, which had also rejected Bahrain's bid for state immunity. This latest development paves the way for the lawsuit to proceed, potentially shedding light on the alleged surveillance activities.

Image

This case highlights the complex relationship between Bahrain and its dissidents. The country, an island nation in the Persian Gulf, has faced political unrest and protests since 2011. Despite its small size, with a population of approximately 1.5 million, Bahrain plays a significant role in regional geopolitics, hosting the United States Navy's Fifth Fleet.

Bahrain's attempts to block this lawsuit come against a backdrop of international scrutiny regarding its human rights record. The country, which gained independence from the United Kingdom in 1971, has been criticized for alleged violations of civil liberties. This legal challenge in British courts underscores the global nature of such concerns.

The case also draws attention to the broader issue of state surveillance and its impact on dissidents and activists. As Bahrain works to diversify its economy and promote itself as a hub for fintech and digital innovation, cases like this may have implications for its international reputation.

It's worth noting that Bahrain, under the rule of King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa, has been making efforts to modernize and reform. The country was the first Gulf state to discover oil in 1932 and has since been working to reduce its economic dependence on petroleum processing and refining.

As this legal battle unfolds, it may have ramifications beyond the immediate parties involved. The case could potentially influence discussions about state accountability, cybersecurity, and the rights of dissidents in an increasingly interconnected world.

"We maintain our position that these allegations are unfounded and reject any claims of improper surveillance activities."

Statement from Bahrain's legal representatives

The outcome of this case will be closely watched by human rights organizations, legal experts, and governments around the world. It serves as a reminder of the ongoing challenges in balancing national security concerns with individual rights and freedoms in the digital age.