Georgia Democrats Challenge New Election Certification Rules in Court

A significant legal battle is set to unfold in Atlanta as a trial commences to address a lawsuit filed by Democrats challenging two recently implemented rules by the Georgia State Election Board. These rules, pertaining to county certification of election results, have sparked a heated debate over their potential impact on the upcoming presidential election.

The trial, scheduled for October 1, 2024, will be presided over by Judge Robert McBurney in Fulton County Superior Court. This case underscores the ongoing tensions in Georgia's electoral process, a state that has become a key battleground in recent presidential elections with its 16 electoral votes.

At the heart of the dispute are two new rules: one defining certification as requiring a "reasonable inquiry" before county officials sign off on results, and another allowing county election officials to examine all election-related documentation. Supporters argue these measures are essential for ensuring accuracy, while critics express concerns about potential misuse.

The lawsuit, filed by state and national Democratic parties, along with county election board members and Democratic lawmakers, seeks to clarify that election superintendents have no discretion to withhold or delay certification. This legal action reflects the heightened scrutiny on Georgia's election procedures, which have faced multiple lawsuits in recent years.

Georgia's electoral landscape has undergone significant changes since 2020, including the implementation of new voting laws in 2021 with SB 202. The state now uses a direct recording electronic (DRE) voting system with paper ballot backups, and has introduced risk-limiting audits for elections.

The State Election Board, dominated by three Republican partisans, has used its 3-2 majority to pass numerous election rules in recent months. This has occurred despite cautions from Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, county election officials, and the state attorney general's office against adopting new rules close to the general election.

"These new rules are necessary to ensure the integrity of our election process and maintain public trust in the results."

Critics argue that these rules could potentially be exploited by supporters of the Republican presidential nominee to delay or deny certification if their candidate loses the state. This concern is particularly acute given Georgia's history of close presidential election results and its use of a "no-excuse" absentee voting system.

The state's defense maintains that the Democrats' lawsuit essentially seeks to reinforce existing state law, which mandates county certification by 5 p.m. on the Monday following the election, or the next day if that Monday is a holiday.

This trial is part of a broader context of electoral challenges in Georgia. The state has faced allegations of voter suppression in recent years and conducted a full hand recount of presidential election ballots in 2020. With its 159 counties, each having its own election board, Georgia's electoral system is complex and often under scrutiny.

As the trial begins, it highlights the delicate balance between ensuring election integrity and maintaining a smooth, timely certification process. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for how Georgia's 16 electoral votes are allocated in future presidential elections, potentially influencing national results in close races.