Georgia's Progressive Prosecutors Face Tough Reelection Amid Criticism
Two Georgia district attorneys, elected in 2020 on reform platforms, confront challenges in upcoming races. Critics cite office dysfunction, while supporters defend their progressive approach to criminal justice.
In the state of Georgia, known for its rich history as one of the original 13 colonies, two district attorneys are facing a crucial test of their progressive policies. Shalena Cook Jones of Chatham County and Deborah Gonzalez of Athens-Clarke and Oconee counties, both elected in 2020, are encountering significant opposition as they seek reelection.
These prosecutors, part of a nationwide trend towards reform-minded district attorneys, promised a more holistic approach to criminal justice. Their policies include diversion programs, rehabilitation efforts, and shorter sentences for nonviolent offenders. However, their tenure has been marked by controversy and criticism from both Republicans and some prominent local Democrats.
Critics argue that the offices led by Jones and Gonzalez have been dysfunctional, allowing individuals convicted of violent crimes to evade appropriate punishment. Even Democratic leaders like Athens-Clarke County Mayor Kelly Girtz and Savannah Mayor Van Johnson have voiced concerns about their performance.
The pushback against progressive prosecutors is not unique to Georgia. Similar efforts to remove or restrict the power of reform-minded district attorneys have occurred in states such as Texas, Indiana, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Missouri, and Florida. In Georgia, this opposition culminated in a 2023 law signed by Republican Governor Brian Kemp, establishing a commission to oversee prosecutors.
Both Jones and Gonzalez have faced significant challenges since taking office. Their tenures have been marked by staff exoduses, with dozens of employees leaving their offices. While some turnover is expected with new leadership, the scale of departures in these offices has been notably high.
Former staff members have cited various reasons for leaving, ranging from policy disagreements to concerns about office management and overwhelming caseloads. June Teasley, who worked for both prosecutors, suggested that while people left Jones' office due to ideological differences, departures from Gonzalez's office were more related to functional issues.
Despite these challenges, both prosecutors defend their records and point to accomplishments. Gonzalez highlights efforts in expunging records, resentencing individuals, and referring juveniles to restorative justice programs. Jones emphasizes her focus on violent cases and initiatives to expand diversion programs and examine wrongful convictions.
The upcoming reelection races will serve as a referendum on the viability of progressive prosecution in Georgia. As the state continues to evolve politically, these races may provide insight into the future of criminal justice reform in the region.
"I have suffered, bled and died for this DA office over and over and over again. If they don't want me, I'm fine with that. That means I can go back to my family and raise my kids."
As Georgia, home to historical landmarks like Stone Mountain and the bustling Port of Savannah, grapples with these legal and political challenges, the outcomes of these races may have far-reaching implications for the state's approach to criminal justice. The debate continues to unfold in a state known for its peaches, pecans, and rich cultural heritage, from the music scene of Athens to the historic districts of Savannah.
