Harris Rallies Energize Supporters with Bold Language, Raising Political Stakes

Vice President Kamala Harris's recent campaign events have taken on a new energy, with supporters and allies employing bold language to express their enthusiasm. At a rally in Philadelphia on August 6, 2024, attendees chanted lyrics from Ludacris's 2001 hit "Move B----," directed at Republican nominee Donald Trump.

The atmosphere at Harris's rallies reflects a growing trend in political discourse, where strong language is increasingly used to energize supporters and express frustration. Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro and Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer have both embraced this approach, using phrases like "Get s--- done" and "Hell yeah" to rouse crowds.

While Harris, the first woman, African American, and Asian American vice president, is known for using colorful language in private, she has maintained a more restrained public persona during her campaign. This contrast highlights the unique challenges she faces as a groundbreaking candidate, potentially subject to greater scrutiny than her male predecessors.

The use of profanity in politics has a long history. Presidents like Lyndon B. Johnson and Richard Nixon were known for their colorful language, particularly in private. More recently, Barack Obama occasionally used strong language behind closed doors. However, the public use of such language has become more common and accepted in recent years.

Tim Walz, Harris's running mate and Governor of Minnesota since 2019, has taken a slightly bolder approach in his public remarks. Walz, a former football coach, has been praised by some Democrats for his plain-spoken style, which is seen as a sign of authenticity.

"I don't know how you feel, but I'm f---ing angry! Donald Trump doesn't know s--- about the auto industry, and he doesn't give a damn about the working class of this country."

The contrast with Trump's use of vulgar language is notable. The former president has long been known for his unfiltered speech, using crude nicknames and expletives both in private and public settings. This has perhaps made his more recent vulgarities seem less novel to some observers.

As the campaign progresses, Harris and her team must navigate the fine line between energizing supporters and maintaining a presidential image. The use of strong language by allies and surrogates may allow the campaign to tap into voter frustration without Harris herself using explicit terms.

With just three months until the election, the political stakes are high. The Harris campaign's approach to language and messaging will likely continue to evolve as they seek to mobilize voters and present a compelling alternative to their opponents.