House Panel Recommends Contempt for Blinken Over Afghanistan Withdrawal

U.S. House committee votes to hold Secretary of State in contempt for subpoena non-compliance regarding Afghanistan withdrawal. Full House vote pending as Blinken cites scheduling conflicts.

September 24 2024, 09:00 PM  •  610 views

House Panel Recommends Contempt for Blinken Over Afghanistan Withdrawal

In a significant development, the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee has recommended holding Antony Blinken, the Secretary of State, in contempt of Congress. This decision, made on September 24, 2024, stems from Blinken's alleged failure to comply with a subpoena concerning the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021.

The committee, one of 20 standing committees in the 435-member House of Representatives, voted 26-25 in favor of the contempt recommendation. This narrow margin underscores the contentious nature of the issue, which has its roots in events that occurred over three years ago.

Blinken, who assumed his role on January 26, 2021, was absent from a scheduled hearing on the day of the vote. His absence was due to his attendance at the 79th session of the UN General Assembly in New York, which opened on September 17, 2024.

In a letter dated September 22, 2024, Blinken addressed Committee Chairman Michael McCaul, who has served as a U.S. Representative since 2005. The Secretary of State outlined his attempts to accommodate the committee's schedule and offered alternative witnesses to testify.

Image

The State Department, established in 1789 and the oldest executive department, has not immediately responded to requests for comment on the committee's decision.

The contempt of Congress process, which dates back to the 1790s, is defined in statute 2 U.S.C.A. § 192. This law outlines the procedure for the House or Senate to refer a non-compliant witness for criminal prosecution. However, the final decision on whether to pursue criminal charges rests with the U.S. Justice Department, an entity created in 1870.

The timing of a full House vote on the committee's recommendation remains uncertain. This situation highlights the complex interplay between the legislative and executive branches, a fundamental aspect of the U.S. constitutional system established in 1789.

The controversy surrounding the Afghanistan withdrawal is part of a longer history of U.S. involvement in the country, which began in 2001. The last U.S. military planes departed Afghanistan on August 30, 2021, marking the end of a two-decade-long engagement.

This ongoing investigation by the House Foreign Affairs Committee, established in 1822, demonstrates Congress's constitutional power to issue subpoenas and conduct oversight of executive actions.

As this situation unfolds, it adds another chapter to the rich history of U.S. governance, which includes institutions like the National Press Club (founded in 1908) and media outlets such as NPR (established in 1970) and C-SPAN (launched in 1979) that play crucial roles in informing the public about such governmental proceedings.

The outcome of this contempt recommendation and its potential impact on U.S. foreign policy and executive-legislative relations remain to be seen. As the story develops, it will likely be closely followed by various think tanks, including the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, and reported on by long-standing news organizations like Reuters, which has been operating since 1851.