For free real time breaking news alerts sent straight to your inbox sign up to our breaking news emails
Sign up to our free breaking news emails
Several NHS trusts in England have been accused of using foreign doctors as “cheap labour”, with training schemes branded “exploitative”, an investigation has found.
Foreign doctors can come to work at English hospital trusts for two years as fellows to gain experience to implement in practice in their home countries.
The programme is part of the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges’ Medical Training Initiative (MTI) scheme. A number of doctors are sponsored, while a proportion are directly employed by a trust.
However, an investigation by The British Medical Journal (BMJ) claims some fellows are paid less than other employees, and have fewer benefits.
According to the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (AoMRC), since the scheme began in 2009 there have been almost 7,000 trainees from countries such as Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka, Egypt, Nigeria and Saudi Arabia.
All doctors should be paid the correct rate for their work, regardless of whether they are on the MTI scheme or not
The BMJ said it found an agreement between the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan (CPSP) with University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UHB), Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, and Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust led to trainees being paid less than trust-employed workers.
It claims senior fellows from Pakistan who worked at UHB as grade three specialty trainee (ST3) registrars or above were paid a stipend of between £2,700 and £3,600 a month by CPSP, which is the equivalent of £32,400 to £43,200 tax-free a year.
They are not guaranteed overtime pay or pay for on-call work.
The BMJ said UHB would not confirm the exact equivalent salary details, but according to NHS payscales, ST3 doctors employed by the trust were paid £51,017 in 2022/23 and £55,328 a year in 2023/24 as a basic gross salary, excluding any overtime or enhanced hours payments.
One consultant, who spoke to the BMJ anonymously, claimed UHB was using fellows as “cheap labour”, although another senior medic at the trust praised the scheme for its training opportunities, but highlighted a lack of equal pay and rights.
However, UHB said that it was not representative to compare the two pay scales.
It said The BMJ had compared the net tax-free pay for international training fellows to the gross pay on an ST3 NHS doctor. The Trust said that the net pay for an ST3, after taxes and student loan assumptions, could be around £2,670 which is ‘reasonably equivalent’.
An AoMRC spokesperson said: “The issues the BMJ is raising here are very concerning. All doctors should be paid the correct rate for their work, regardless of whether they are on the MTI scheme or not.
“But this is a matter between the doctor and the NHS organisation that employs them.”
Under the deal, fellows at UHB also do not get paid parental leave, the BMJ claimed.
Programmes which encourage the upskilling of medical practitioners from countries with less-developed healthcare systems have been described by the WHO as a ‘brain gain and not a brain drain’
One doctor told the publication she was sent home when she revealed news of her pregnancy.
She said: “One lady from the international team seemed angry and said “we don’t expect you guys to get pregnant while you’re here” and that my fellowship would be terminated. It was a shock to me how she spoke.”
Michael Newman, an employment lawyer at law firm Leigh Day, told The BMJ that every worker is entitled to maternity leave after they begin employment by law, and they are entitled to statutory maternity pay after 26 weeks of employment.
He described the conditions of the scheme as “exploitative”.
In light of the BMJ investigation, CPSP is set to review and overhaul some guidelines, but said the scheme has improved healthcare in Pakistan.
A spokesperson for UHB said the programme “undoubtedly benefits the NHS system, but in return it benefits the overseas healthcare structure”.
They added: “Programmes which encourage the upskilling of medical practitioners from countries with less-developed healthcare systems have been described by the WHO as a ‘brain gain and not a brain drain’.”
Diane Wake, chief executive of the Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, told The BMJ: “As we do not directly employ staff who are a part of the medical trainee scheme we are, therefore, not responsible for their remuneration.
“Our trust has not received any concerns from our MTI colleagues, however, should they have any that they would like to raise with us directly, we would be more than happy to look into them.”
She added that any overtime would be paid at the bank rates used for all trust medical staff and that fellows all receive 28 days free accommodation on arrival.
Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust said it has recruited three MTI fellows under the CPSP scheme, who are due to start in November, but does not have any in post at present.
A spokesman said: “The job description, person specification and rota patterns have been reviewed and approved by the dean.”
An NHS spokesperson said: “While the salary of these positions is agreed between the individual trust and their international partner, fellows play an important role in treating NHS patients at the same time as learning new advanced clinical skills in a high-quality and fair learning environment, before returning to their home country.”