Great Britain
This article was added by the user . TheWorldNews is not responsible for the content of the platform.

Voice: Nationalizing an energy company does not reduce your bill, but there are alternatives.

Last weekendLabor MP Sam Tully announced thathis partyan idea that has grown in popularity with rising utility costs. His thoughts are echoed in the TUC, stating that doing so will bring a fairer bill to the household. It is also widely supported by the public.More than half of the British public,, wanted the energy companies to be nationalized, while only 8% were against it.

Energy, like water and health services, is a basic necessity of life. Unless you live in a Himalayan cave, you can't do anything without it. So I agree withTUC. Governments, like other public goods, have an obligation to ensure the availability of cheap and reliable electricity. But governments that run energy companies have no answer. Because the government doesn't explain how the industry is changing and doesn't cut the bills.

Since the UK is no longer an energy producer, nationalized energy companies still have to pay very high prices for coal, oil and gas abroad. Shift from energy tariffs to taxpayer tariffs. This is fairer, but doesn't result in lower fees. This made sense when Britain was a coal-mining nation, with centralized energy production and tightly controlled industry.

There are better ways to reduce your utility bills. It's about decentralizing everything. Let everyone install solar panels and wind farms to generate their own electricity. Ask every office, school, and parliamentary building in the country to have solar panels on their roofs. A local community group can set up its own wind farm and sell its power locally. In other words, unleash a clean energy revolution.

This is bottom-up, not top-down, so no government funding is required. To do this, there is a huge demand across the country, and the problem is regulation, not money. The Conservative Party is making it very difficult to build solar and wind farms on British land, and her two candidates for leadership are We want to make it even harder.Despite being very popular with the public,clean energy has been deliberately strangled by the Tories. It should not be a debate about whether to nationalize or not. You should have the guts to do what the Conservative Party won't do. It's about starting a clean energy revolution here in the country. Create jobs, lower bills and ensure future energy security. The UK may not be so sunny, but solar panels need sunlight, not warm weather, to generate electricity.

Isn't that too far-fetched? In fact, this idea is behind the Democrats Inflation Reduction Act.Because clean energy is cheap and investing in it can help lower your energy bills. The aim is to accelerate the deployment of solar and wind farms across the United States and store that energy in battery technology (for when the wind isn't blowing and the sun isn't shining). In Australia, households are very enthusiastic about using solar panels, andelectricity bills in the summer arealmost zero. China, on the other hand, has built more wind capacity in one yearthan the rest of the world combined in her five years.

For all the latest thoughts and comments, subscribe to our free weekly Voices Dispatches newsletter byPlease sign up. CLICK HERE

Forward-thinking countries around the world are investing in clean energy and enabling businesses and people to do it themselves. The only place we're stuck in is England because the Conservatives would rather import oil and gas. This puts us at the mercy of President Putin.

Does this mean Labor will say nothing? Not at all. We need to make a strong case for the clean energy revolution. We also need to consider how to reform the national grid and upgrade it to better handle clean energy. It may need to be nationalized.

But the debate over whether energy companies should be nationalized should be left to the 70s and 80s. Britain must move on. Because the technology itself does.