DOJ Backs Workers in Antitrust Suit Against Healthcare Giant UPMC

U.S. Justice Department supports lawsuit alleging wage suppression and job mobility restrictions by University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. UPMC, Pennsylvania's largest private employer, denies all claims.

October 1 2024, 10:14 PM  •  89 views

DOJ Backs Workers in Antitrust Suit Against Healthcare Giant UPMC

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has taken a significant step in supporting current and former employees of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) in their legal battle against the healthcare giant. The lawsuit, filed in January 2024, alleges that UPMC, Pennsylvania's largest private sector employer, violated antitrust laws by suppressing wages and restricting job mobility.

On September 30, 2024, the DOJ filed a "statement of interest" in the proposed class action lawsuit in federal court in Erie, Pennsylvania. This move underscores the Biden administration's commitment to utilizing antitrust laws to address alleged worker restraints.

UPMC, founded in 1893 as Western Pennsylvania Hospital, has grown to become a healthcare behemoth with over 40 hospitals and 700 clinical locations. The organization boasts 95,000 employees and generates an annual revenue of $26 billion, making it the largest non-governmental employer in Pennsylvania.

The plaintiffs, including nurses, doctors, and medical assistants, accuse UPMC of imposing improper noncompete agreements on doctors and using mergers and acquisitions to bolster market power and control over workers. They also allege that the center required nurses to care for more patients without additional compensation.

Image

In its filing, the DOJ stated that the lawsuit's allegations "suggest a breakdown in the competitive process harmful to tens of thousands of healthcare workers and hundreds of thousands of patients." The department urged U.S. District Judge Susan Paradise Baxter to deny UPMC's bid to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that the medical center "misstates and misapplies" the relevant legal standards.

UPMC has vehemently denied all allegations. In a statement released on October 1, 2024, the organization declared, "The plaintiffs' allegations are factually incorrect and legally unfounded."

This legal battle comes amid UPMC's significant expansion and technological advancements. The organization operates international facilities in China, Italy, Ireland, and Kazakhstan, and has invested heavily in artificial intelligence and robotics in healthcare. UPMC also runs a busy transplant center and has partnered with Microsoft for cloud-based medical imaging.

Despite its growth and innovations, UPMC has faced criticism for its rapid expansion and market dominance. The organization has been involved in multiple labor disputes and antitrust lawsuits over the years, highlighting the complex relationship between healthcare providers and their workforce.

The lawsuit seeks class action status for potentially thousands of current and former skilled healthcare workers at UPMC. Plaintiffs' lawyers assert that the medical center adopted a "do-not-rehire" policy that sanctions workers who leave and imposes restrictions on the ability of workers to demand better working conditions.

UPMC counters that the lawsuit has not demonstrated how its alleged workplace restrictions prevent other employers from competing for the same workers. The organization also argues that the plaintiffs brought their claims too late under antitrust law.

As this case unfolds, it will likely have significant implications for the healthcare industry and worker rights. The DOJ's involvement underscores the importance of fair competition and labor practices in the healthcare sector, which directly impacts the quality of patient care and the well-being of healthcare professionals.

"The plaintiffs' allegations are factually incorrect and legally unfounded."

UPMC Statement

This case, Jennifer Mizell et al v. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, is being closely watched by legal experts and healthcare professionals alike. As the largest non-governmental employer in Pennsylvania and a major player in the healthcare industry, the outcome of this lawsuit could have far-reaching consequences for labor practices in the medical field and beyond.