Barbados
This article was added by the user . TheWorldNews is not responsible for the content of the platform.

Chief Justice explains who has authority to decide on use of post-nominals

By Jenique Belgrave

Chief Justice Sir Patterson Cheltenham has stepped into the debate about the replacement of the Queen’s Counsel (QC) and King’s Counsel (KC) titles with Senior Counsel (SC), while Attorney General Dale Marshall has questioned why lawyers were resistant to the change in a republic Barbados.

It was revealed in the Official Gazette dated September 1, 2023, that Cabinet had agreed the KC and QC post-nominals would be discontinued, and all members of the legal profession appointed to the Inner Bar would be known as Senior Counsel.

The announcement was met with intense discussion within the fraternity and in the general public about whether lawyers should be allowed to continue the use of the QC post-nominal given the island’s new republican status and the death of Queen Elizabeth II, as well as whether the Cabinet had the authority to make the change.

On Friday, speaking at a special sitting to welcome 11 attorneys to the Inner Bar, Sir Patterson said: “Questions have been asked of me – who appoints an SC? At least one aspect of the inquiry has been settled by this morning’s proceedings. In future, all these elevated to the Inner Bar will be SCs unless Parliament in its wisdom decrees otherwise.

“On 1st January 1979, the Profession Trade and Business Registration Act took effect…. A perusal of the Act, and in particular the First Schedule reveals a clear reference to – Attorney-at-law – S.C. and Q.C.

Attorney-at-law (other than S.C. or Q.C.). The authority to grant the honour and dignity remains an executive decision and the authority to affix the post-nominals is vested in Cap.373.”

In a brief address to the gathering, Marshall noted that with Barbados’ change to republican status, while there was little doubt that in respect of other offices — parliamentarians, judges and the President itself – “any duty and fealty should be owed to our nation, yet somehow, we, the lawyers, have been timid about accepting that the same precept would apply to the upper echelons of the legal profession”.

“Some members of the Inner Bar, quite peculiarly, see nothing odd about continuing to accept an obligation to plead the King’s cause, in circumstances where these Courts are no longer the King’s Courts,” he argued.

Pointing out that India, Hong Kong, Ireland, South Africa, Singapore, Kenya, Guyana and Trinidad and Tobago have all switched to the title with no monarchical connotations, Marshall urged that the change made here be embraced as the island moves to forge a new path.

“It is fitting that in our new republic, shorn of the umbilicus which connected our institutions and our very psyche, to the monarchy, that we should take this step in completing the process of true independence,” he stated.

Marshall also noted that it was not the first time the island had ceased to use the QC designation for one of SC, as it had occurred in 1975 before the decision was made to revert to the former title four years later.

The 11 new SCs at Friday’s special sitting were Wilfred Abrahams, Tammy Bryan, Rudolph Cappy Greenidge, Gillian Henderson-Clarke, Kathy-Ann Hamblin, Edmund Hinkson, Anika Jackson, Stephen Lashley, Angela Mitchell-Gittens, Alliston Seale and Liesel Weekes. 

Arthur Holder, the 12th, was absent as he is overseas on national duty.

Sir Patterson offered the attorneys congratulations on their elevation and reminded them that as they are the island’s first Senior Counsels since Barbados became a republic, the public’s gaze would be focused on them.

He urged them to use the opportunity to display the appropriate “grit and resourcefulness as you strive to become a source of confidence to colleagues”.  

[email protected]

Read our ePaper. Fast. Factual. Free.