Employment is like breath. It's our quiet companion. It goes along with our lives, both good and bad. It supports us. We rarely add much value to it until we lose it.
As pandemic parameters become ambiguous, less motivated to work from home, and more cravings, employees are all breathtaking.
Throughout the Internet, employers are being "banished" from their employees because they have been recalled to work via leaked emails and notes. Employees around the world have posted videos of their "wfh" arrangements, packed with comedy relief on how to be intrigued during a zoom call in the office.
The tone of many employees' videos about working from home is overwhelmingly one of the pure and shy indifference to their work.
Tesla has ordered employees to work at least 40 hours a week at the end of May, so their recent employer is Tesla. "The older you are, the more prominent your presence should be," she added to her email.
Since the email was circulated to employees and leaked publicly, Tesla plans to bring employees back to work, returning them to their regrets and some media. Has continued unabated.
For example, at the end of June, a Tesla employee who did not comply with the Edict of Return to Work received an automatic email using the company badge to inform them that they did not go to work. It has been reported. He was obliged to return to the office full-time and instructed his employees to explain his absence to his boss.
Again, this email was leaked by one or more people I did. Employees and Tesla have been snubbed internationally to "monitor" their attendance at the office.
You can certainly say something about the lack of tact in communicating with Tesla employees, but in reality it's a car maker. It's easy to imagine how Tesla employees need to return to work for the company to grow.
Employees can push back the obvious fact that some work is really essential and needs to be done directly, causing long-term damage to their careers. there is.
Why did the city of Toronto consider 80% of its civil servants "required" and mandated that city officials return to work in March. Most of us may think that much of what civil servants do can be done remotely, but in reality, the nature of the work is not what the Peanuts Gallery emphasizes. Only your employer can determine the environment you want to build and the optimal employee dynamics to meet your task.
In fact, some employees have to return to their "non-evolving" role. Those without the term "hybrid" or "remote". Unmarked on zoom calls or Google Hangouts. Sometimes you just have to get back to work.
The pandemic between employers and employees looks like a global recession and companies, including Tesla, have announced company-wide layoffs. It must be resolved.
The pandemic has given employers new ways of working and incentives for their employees. That progress is at risk of being lost as the online attitude further divides the working world.
Sophisticated employers take advantage of progress. Strategic employees look back at how their role fits into the big picture and consider that face-to-face work in the face of a recession can be a boon rather than a curse.
It's time to take a deep breath.
About this week's question:
Q. I quit my job for 15 years. My employer provided me with about four months' wages and allowances when I retired. From all I read, this is a low offer, but I interviewed for a new job, and I think I might be in a position to start it in two weeks. What is the best thing to do?
A. Ontario is entitled to the minimum statutory requirements under the Employment Standards Act upon retirement. Beyond that, you are entitled to additional damages based on the time it takes to find a similar job for a similar wage. If you secure a similar job near your retirement date, you may not be entitled to additional damages. Employment law does not aim to inflict more than the actual loss on a dismissed employee. Therefore, when considering retirement package options, you need to weigh the impact of your new job.
Q. After I blogged about my work experience there, I received a cease and desist letter from my old employer. It was a really bad place to work, and this letter from my employer confirms it. How is it legal not to be allowed to talk to me about what happened?
A. If you signed the release when you left your former employer (perhaps in exchange for a retirement package), the release may contain a confidentiality clause. And may contain non-disclosure clauses. In that case, posting about your experience there may violate the agreement you made at the time of departure. Even if you do not sign the release, negative statements about your employer can lead to defamation and have some impact on your former employer's reputation. For this reason, we strongly recommend that you consider deleting posts.
I have a question at work. Maybe I can help. Please send an email to sunira@worklylaw.com. Your question may be addressed in a future article.
From the newsroom to the noon inbox, Toronto Sun's latest headlines, stories, opinions and photos. By clicking the
Thank you for registering.
A welcome email has been sent. If you don't see it, check your junk folder.
Your Midday Sun's next issue will arrive in your inbox shortly.
