Article Author:
Washington — On Last Week After a groundbreaking ruling expanded the rights of individual guns, the U.S. Supreme Court said on Thursday that gun restrictions such as a ban on attack-style rifles in Maryland and large ammunition magazines in New Jersey and California. Dismissed several lower court decisions in favor of.
Judge's proceedings sent these cases back to the lower court, proclaiming the constitutional right to publicly carry pistols for self-defense in the light of the June 23 ruling. did.
Last week's 6-3 ruling was dominated by conservative judges, opposed by liberal judges, and put a hidden pistol in New York out of the house. Breaked the restrictions on taking it out to. The court found that the law enacted in 1913 violated the rights of those who "hold the right to arm" under Article 2 of the Constitutional Amendment. The
ruling also clarifies how courts must assess whether regulations are valid under Article 2 of the US Constitutional Amendment, traditionally throughout US history. Must be equivalent to the regulations adopted. According to legal experts, gun control advocates say that such standards could allow courts to revoke national gun control.
Judge's actions on Thursday revisited decisions such as a lower court allowing gun restrictions to uphold a ban on "very dangerous military assault rifles" in Maryland. Means you need to.
Maryland is a gunner who mass-murdered 20 children and 6 adults in 2012 at Sandy Hook Elementary School in New Town, Connecticut. After using it, a ban was enacted. Maryland said in a legal document that five other states also banned these weapons.
Recent US guns, including 19 children and two teachers killed in an attack on May 24 and killed in an attack on May 14 at an elementary school in Yuvarde, Texas. In the mass shootings, assault-type rifles have repeatedly occurred. 10 people at a grocery store in Buffalo, NY.
Maryland plaintiffs are destined for their proceedings under a 2017 ruling by the Fourth US Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Richmond, Virginia, which upheld the Maryland ban. He filed a proceeding in 2020, despite admitting that he had been granted. The Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal of the ruling.
Disputing the term "assault weapons" as an inaccurate "political term," Maryland plaintiffs said assault weapons were "general" by millions of laws. "It is used in", so it cannot be completely banned. Protect individuals like the pistols in question in the 2008 groundbreaking Supreme Court ruling that withdrew the ban on firearms in the US capital.
The judge sent back to the lower court another ruling in support of the ban on firearm magazines with more than 10 ammunition in New Jersey and California. The proceedings in these proceedings were filed by a state member of the National Rifle Association, a gun rights group that works closely with the Republican Party.
The Supreme Court also dismissed a lower court ruling in favor of Hawaii's restrictions on the public and open transport of firearms under Article 2 of the US Constitutional Amendment.
Beloved by many Americans and promised by the country's 18th century founders, gun rights are controversial in countries with high levels of firearm violence. I am.
Last week's ruling represents the court's most important statement on gun rights over a decade. A court in 2008 granted the individual's right to keep a gun at home for self-defense in a proceeding in the District of Columbia for the first time, and applied that right to the state in 2010.
President Joe Biden signed the first major federal gun control in 30 years last Saturday, two days after the court invalidated gun control in New York.
A new law blocks the sale of guns to those convicted of abusing an unmarried intimate partner and to purchasers convicted of domestic violence. Crack down on sales. It will also provide new federal funding to states that administer a "danger signal" law aimed at removing guns from people who are considered dangerous to themselves and others.
It does not ban the sale of assault-style rifles or large magazines, Biden supports. However, by allowing access to information about the serious crimes committed by the boy for the first time, he has taken some steps in the background check.
(Report by Andrew Chung; Edited by Will Dunham)
