All rights reserved. This material and any other material on this platform may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, written or distributed in full or in part, without written permission from PREMIUM TIMES.
The Court of Appeal on Tuesday in Abuja court dismissed the application filed by former lawmaker, Farouk Lawan, seeking to terminate the $3 million bribery charges filed by the federal government.
Mr Lawan was the Chairman of the House of Representatives Ad hoc Committee on Fuel Subsidy in 2012.
Mr Lawan had approached the appellate court to set aside the decision of an Abuja High Court presided over by Angela Otaluka and free him from the charges.
Delivering judgment in the appeal filed against the ruling of Mrs Otaluka which held that Mr Lawan had a case to answer, Olabisi Ige, the judge who headed the panel held that the decision of the lower court was well founded.
The appellate court in a unanimous decision held that a prima facie case was well established against Mr Lawan that warranted him to enter his defence in the three counts charge filed against him in 2013.
Mr Ige held that contrary to the argument of Mr Lawan, the prosecution evidence at the lower court was not in any way discredited, hence the rejection of his no-case submission.
The appellate court also held that the language of the trial judge, Mrs Otaluka which Mr Lawan complained about, did not place the defendant in any disadvantage position or was in any way inimical to his trial.
The judge quoted the records of proceedings of the FCT High Court, especially the testimonies of the five witnesses called by the federal government.
The panel upheld the findings of Mrs Otaluka that there was sufficient evidence linking Mr Lawan to the offences.
“I am of the firm view and I have no doubt that the oral and documentary evidence presented by the prosecution sufficiently linked the appellant to the charges against him and to warrant his being called upon to make his defence.
“Prosecution evidence was not slanted in favour of the prosecution. In all, all the four issues raised in this appeal are hereby resolved against the appellant. His appeal, being un-meritorious, is hereby dismissed”, he held.
Mrs Otaluka had sometimes last year dismissed the no-case-submission filed by Mr Lawan who was then Chairman of the House of Representatives Ad hoc Committee on Oil and Gas in his alleged $3 million bribery trial.
The prosecution closed its case after calling five witnesses, Mr Lawan, through his counsel, Mike Ozekhome SAN, had filed a no-case submission on the grounds that the evidence and testimonies did not link Mr Lawan to the crime.
Mr Ozekhome said the prosecution’s witnesses gave conflicting statements about the amount Mr Lawan was alleged to have collected from the fifth prosecution witness, Femi Otedola, who offered the alleged bribe to Mr Lawan.
Mr Ozekhome in addition argued that the video evidence showing how Mr Lawan collected a bribe from Mr Otedola was blurry and does not necessarily prove that the content of the envelope Mr Otedola gave to Mr Lawan was money but could have been anything else.
He further submitted that if the Department of State Services (DSS) had any evidence they would have arrested Mr Lawan immediately at the scene of the bribery which they claimed they set up.
Responding, prosecution lawyer, Adegboyega Awomolo, SAN, urged the court to dismiss the no-case submission and ordered the defendant to enter his defence.
He added that because the prosecution had established sufficient evidence through video and oral testimonies which linked Mr Lawan to the alleged offences.
Mrs Otaluka agreed with the submission of Mr Awomolo and ordered Mr Lawan to open his defence.