South Africa

News24.com | Why Johannesburg's anti-crime cameras are similar to apartheid-era pass laws - expert

Joburg's new anti-crime cameras have been criticised.

Joburg's new anti-crime cameras have been criticised.

 

Johannesburg's anti-crime surveillance cameras can do a lot of damage, and can be even more destructive and exclusionary than South Africa's pass law system was, an expert has warned.

Michael Kwet, from Yale University, who researched Johannesburg's Safe City Initiative, on Tuesday told a webinar organised by the Southern African Institute of International Affairs "while there's a lot of hype, [the cameras] can do a lot of damage and they can be very destructive, and this was kind of like the pass law system in South Africa".

READ | ISIS-linked group forced out of Mozambique, says president

He said there were parallels with the apartheid government regulating racial quotas, trying to "filter" people who were allowed in whites-only neighbourhoods. He said "great efficiency" wasn't really achieved because, during that time, the technology was "extraordinarily primitive" and difficult to maintain.

He said:

But, nevertheless, the pass law system was very destructive, and it was used as a justification to harass people, sometimes to torture them if they didn't have a pass or the authorities said they didn't have a pass. So it could wind up being something that does a lot of damage.

He said cameras were used on campuses during the Fees Must Fall protests to "target" students and leaders throwing stones at buildings.

"If they were looking at targeting the movement on campus, they could use the footage to target students, and they did," he said.

He said there was a "growing capacity" in using these systems; for example, Vumacam in 2019 announced that it would install 50 000 cameras, but soon after the company announced that it was looking at doubling this.

Expanded

"If you look at how fast these systems have grown and how they have expanded in sophistication, there is actually good reason, from a civil rights and liberties perspective, to be very worried about the direction that this could go," he said.

"And it's not healthy, and it's not good to live in a filmed society, so going outside into an urban space, do you want that to be a filmed experience? I think the answer should be no."

He said there was no studies done with solid evidence, outside of anecdotal evidence by police authorities, that cameras are effective in helping to fight crime.

Cameras negatively affect civil liberties and freedoms, he said, and it does not address general problems people have with structural causes, such as poverty.

READ | These Joburg suburbs will have 1 400 cameras that read licence plates before the end of 2020

Kwet said there is generally not enough access to information about these surveillance cameras.

While he commended the City of Johannesburg for providing him with the information he requested, he said this should have been in the City’s report in the first place.

"I shouldn't have to go and ask them which cameras they are using," he said.

He said China was more "in your face" when talking about their cameras and smart city initiatives, while western governments tried to be more discreet and appear more "caring".

Football news:

Griezmann spoke with Hamilton and visited the Mercedes boxes at the Spanish Grand Prix
Barcelona feels that Neymar used it. He said that he wanted to return, but extended his contract with PSG (RAC1)
Aubameyang to the Arsenal fans: We wanted to give you something good. I am sorry that we could not
Atletico did not lose at the Camp Nou. Busquets' injury is the turning point of the match (and the championship race?)
Verratti injured his knee ligaments in PSG training. Participation in the Euro is still in question
Neymar's contract in one picture. Mbappe wants the same one
Manchester United would like to sign Bellingham in the summer, not Sancho. Borussia do not intend to sell Jude