Mayor Erik Adams led the Supreme Court of New York, whereoverturned the state's gun law 100 years agoCame to the Supreme Court — a meeting on Thursday's press warning that "this decision has made each of us less secure from gun violence."
"There is no place in the country where this decision has as much impact as New York City," Adams said in response to a 6-3 ruling, adding that it was "not rooted in reality."
In another statement, Hitsoner swore:
Adams is preparing a decision for his administration, a "comprehensive review" of how to define "sensitive places," that is, places where guns are legally prohibited. He said he was planning to do so.
The mayor also reviewed the city's application process, adding that "only fully qualified persons will be able to obtain a carry license."
The Sullivan Act, which has been in the book since 1913, provides New Yorkers who want permission to carry pistols in public with a "just cause" that weapons are needed specifically for self-defense. I requested that. ..
New York State Rifle and Pistol Association and two northern men challenged the law, claiming thatviolated the rights of Article 2 of the Constitutional Amendment
On Thursday, Judge Clarence Thomas stood by the plaintiff and required the law. Was written as follows. Defense requires exercising the right to hold and bear weapons in public.
At a press conference in Manhattan, Governor Kathy Hokul called the decision "not only reckless", "condemned" and "not what the New Yorkers want."
"My top priority is to keep New Yorkers safe, but today the Supreme Court has put off efforts to protect families and prevent gun violence. We are still dealing with families suffering from mass shootings, "Hochul told reporters.
"This dark day is where we envision Excuse me for coming, to return to what was in 1788 when the United States Constitution was ratified, "she continued.
"I think [the founding father] didn't envision a large-capacity assault weapons magazine for the battlefield, but I think we have to oppose it."
When asked if he would call the legislature back to Albany to create a legislative response to the decision, Mr. Hokur said authorities would need some time to digest the ruling. I promised later. Will not retreat. We will fight back.
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg said the decision was "serious." It will give a big blow. " Big Apple Public Security – And Nationwide.
"The courts are now making it more difficult to limit the number of guns in our community, but I'm doing my best to fight for the safety of everyone in this city. I promise to do my best, and I've been preparing for this decision for weeks, "Brag said.
State Legislature Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins (D-Westchester) said in a statement that New York "will face this latest challenge to pass additional gun safety legislation." I swore.
"Today, the Supreme Court said that guns are more important than living in this. The country. Today's decision reinforces the fact that the state must step up to protect the best interests of its citizens and lead the way to the necessary reforms. " Stewart Cousins said.
Former Mayor Michael Bloomberg shared his thoughts on Twitter, stating that the ruling would make it difficult for elected civil servants to fight gun violence.
"Supreme Court Opinion on New York Pistol&Rifle Association v Brune is not in full contact and shows an extreme vision for life in the United States"Bloomberg tweeted
The New York leaders in Washington , I had various feelings about the judgment.
Congressman Claudia Tenney (R-NY) welcomed the decision and declared that it would "strengthen" the rights of Article 2 of the Constitutional Amendment at the Empire State.
"The Defund the Police movement has become mainstream in the Democratic Party, and if progressive policies such as bail reform fail, street safety will be reduced, so Americans who comply with the law are inside. Being able to protect yourself properly is more important than ever. Tenney said in a statement that
Democratic candidate Lee Zeldin agreed.
"Today, the United States Supreme Court defends its constitutional rights. "A New Yorker who complies with the law that has been attacked for too long," Zeldin said.
Meanwhile, Congressman Mondea Jones (D-NY)said the decisionwas "a direct attack on the safety of millions of New Yorkers and is more dangerous to us. Will bring you a great weapon. " community.
Members of the five provinces made a fuss over the ruling when they pointed out the city's gun crisis, which left the bloody path of innocent victims.
"Today's Supreme Court ruling to increase gun access is devastating,"told city council member Keith Powers (D-Eastside). Told.
"Despite the non-stop tragedy, this decision only makes it easier to carry hidden firearms in New York."
City Council Chairman Adrienne Adams "The body is ready to take action to protect the New Yorker," he said.
"The Supreme Court's decision to overturn New York gun control is dangerous and puts New Yorkers at risk," she said.
"Our country and city are already in danger of gun violence, and this ruling can only exacerbate the harm done to our community."
Jumani Williams, a public advocate who is challenging Hokul at the Democratic Governor's Primary, called the ruling "painful and dangerous news."
"New York already has too many guns in our city, so there's a clear and swift action from Albany, starting with the $ 1 billion investment we sought to deal with daily street violence. I need it. It's not $ 1 billion. It's a gift for the millionaire stadium, "he tweeted.
Even the shameful former government. Andrew Cuomo rang a chime to share his thoughts on the decision.
"This is another catastrophic retreat in the fight against gun violence and only emphasizes the need for bolder gun reforms at the national level. By this ruling, 1910 We're back in the year, but we don't have to stay that way, "Cuomo said.
"Countering this decision should not only be part of the final pre-parliamentary gun package, but also attack the ban on weapons and large magazines nationwide. Allowing unchecked hidden pistols in the city only increases the number of lives lost in gun violence, and avoiding actual actions to prevent gunfire incidents such as those in Buffalo and Yuvarde is even more It only leads to meaningless bloodshed. Americans are already suffering too much. "
Additional report by Nolan Hicks
