USA
This article was added by the user . TheWorldNews is not responsible for the content of the platform.

Biden Brace for the Supreme Court to overthrow Law months after planning the next step

(CNN)President Joe BidenSupreme Court ruling deprives national rights of abortion {9 In the United States in favor of Officials say it could be called.

The upcoming announcement is expected to be made within two weeks before the Supreme Court's term ends, with an emergency response plan at the White House and lobbying by abortion advocates. Will be given a few months of grace. , Someone who wants Biden to take immediate action.

"When a decision is made, we must be ready to stand as a united front," Vice President Kamala Harris told a group of reproductive rights leaders at a video conference Wednesday. .. She described the myriad hurdles women may face immediately when seeking an abortion, but Harris details the actions the government is ready to take when a decision is made. did not do it.

According to people familiar with the debate, the steps the president is considering behind the scenes are to remove barriers to access to drug abortion and to go out of state to have an abortion. Includes disputing state law that criminalizes travel.

From privacy experts, how law enforcement agencies use time-tracking apps to monitor abortions and embryo destruction can be more difficult for in vitro fertilizers. I have heard about. Advocates of color communities and undocumented immigrants have raised specific concerns with the White House about women in those groups who access abortion across state boundaries. And state legislators demanded more federal resources to help manage what many describe as an impending crisis.

"We are exploring all options to address the following decisions and protect access to assisted reproductive technology, including abortion," the White House Gender Policy Council said. Chair Jennifer Klein told Wednesday's virtual meeting.

However, in most cases, federal law has been enforced that prohibits taxpayers' funds from going to abortion and is ready to come into force as soon as the Supreme Court decides. With a state ban rash that has been made, Byden is unlikely to be able to do that, and will radically restore the country's right to end pregnancy. Andhe asks Congress to codify the right to abortion, but he hasn't got enough votes in the Senate.

Therefore, some supporters and lawmakers seek rhetorical leadership of the president who has avoided accepting the right to abortion altogether. He rarely uses the word "abortion" itself-the lack of disrespect for his aides says supporters are still symbolic.

"Now is the past era of this president and this administration, and it is time to explain what is happening as a moral failure and a public health and human rights crisis in this country. Now is the time to shout the word abortion. "

New Mexico, a state without restrictions on the major types of abortion, is in a position to accept an influx of patients from neighboring states such as Texas if the national right to abortion is eliminated. I have. Cadena's appeal to the White House was to be prepared to help a state like her when a woman seeking an abortion travels there in search of an abortion.

"Keeping our doors and clinics open for people from all over the country will be a stretch for us. We are ready and we The values ​​are there, but it's a stretch and it's going to be a reality, which has been done for decades. "

The White House keeps the card close to the vest

The White House considers what administrative measures the president will take as the court approaches its end. The semester hesitated to clarify what he was doing. Biden himself revealed the details when he told the late-night moderatorJimmy Kimmelthat the judge was taking steps in case of a Roe v. Wade case. ..

"We believe there are some presidential orders I can adopt. We are considering it now," he said in early June.

White House spokeswoman Alexandra Ramanna said the Biden administration "continues to seek as many options as possible in response to the expected Supreme Court ruling." He did not mention any specific actions that he might take.

"A president who believes that all Americans should uphold their right to decide, and a radical MAGA policy proposed by Republican officials, including an abortion ban, without exception. The contrast stands out, to make rape, incest, and abortion women and the doctors who carry them out criminals, "Ramanna said. "And dismantling reproductive freedom is only the first step. Overturning Law further imposes government on people's lives and threatens rights such as contraception and access to marriage equality. Open the door. "

Biden is under pressure from activists and Democratic lawmakers to use the full range of his administration to undermine the expected effect of the ruling. However, White House officials say the president is trying to maintain access to abortion for millions of women living in states where abortion is likely to be outlawed once the Supreme Court's ruling is finalized. I'm trying to ease my expectations of what I can do.

In conversations with supporters, the White House heard a variety of options, but not all believe they can withstand legal scrutiny. For example, a call from Biden to allow abortion providers to work from federal property has raised concerns among some lawyers. And providing federal funding for women to travel outside the state can violate the Hyde Amendment, a law that bans federal funding for abortion in almost all cases.

Other options seem more feasible for authorities, such as making abortion medicines readily available by mail to women. However, legal hurdles remain.

At a meeting with reproductive justice leaders last month, White House officials could risk deportation by passing checkpoints on their way to out-of-state clinics. We heard concerns about access to abortion in some, undocumented women.

"People without immigration documents are unlikely to go out of state and seek abortion treatment because of the risk of checkpoints and arrests, adding a layer of criminalization." , Said Yvonne Sue, Chief Policy. Government Secretary of the National Asia Pacific American Women's Forum attending a meeting with White House officials. "I think it really has a chilling effect for the color community and the immigrant community, so what we're doing is making sure they know that these barriers already exist.

A long process to understand the next steps

The process of coming up with the president's options is a court overturning the Law vs. Wade case. However, work accelerated after the draft opinion was leaked. This surprised some White House officials about how widespread the ruling could be.

Biden himself learned of the draft opinion late May 2 when his Chief of Staff Ron Klain called him at the White House residence and explained the leak. In the weeks since then, White House officials have virtually met with dozens of representatives of reproductive rights groups, state legislators, and private law experts to discuss future paths. According to White House officials, senior White House officials have also met weekly with planned parent-child relationships and NARAL Pro-Choice America leaders since the draft opinion was leaked.

"They are what we are hearing, how the people we work with in the field, our partners, the people in the community are reacting, and we I really want to hear what we are seeing from what we expect. Now I think they are really thinking about their response. They want to do something, but in the information I'm trying to do that in a based way, "Sue said.

This work has been led by the White House Gender Policy Council and its director, Klein, and the White House adviser Dana Remus and Susan Rice, director of the National Policy Council. rice field.

Harris also plays a leading role in convening independent discussions with advocates, religious leaders, and legal experts to ensure the protection of certain security and security rights. We have collected various perspectives and policy ideas on how the government can intervene. Roe is turned over.

In a privacy-focused conversation on June 14, Harris was a constitutional lawyer and digital, such as a period tracker, according to New York University reproductive rights expert Melissa Murray. Partially focused on technology questions. discussion.

"She is right there, not only about the type of nuance of the problem, but also the best way to explain this to the public so that she can understand what is really the problem. Thinking and asking a really good question: "Murray said about the conversation.

Menstruation tracking apps and IVF

supporters in the limelight I'm afraid that data from the menstrual tracking app could be used to prosecute a woman who is or is seeking an abortion in the current state. Illegal. Harris said, " "Whether these individual private bodies probably play a role in limiting the amount of data that can be handed over to state authorities interested in prosecuting abortion," Murray said.

Brennan Center for Justice Women and Democracy Fellow Jennifer Weiss Wolf, who participated in the discussion, said Harris was particularly in the letters of Massachusetts Democratic Senators Elizabeth Warren and Patty Murray. He said he was interested in the idea. Washington sent it to Biden in June. The president called on the Department of Health and Human Services to clarify how websites and apps that collect reproductive information should protect sensitive data.

Harris also raised the role of the Federal Trade Commission in these efforts.The group then discussed the prospects of requiring manufacturers of tampons and pads to provide more accurate information about early pregnancy and menstruation in their products.

"We talked about some of the more creative things that are already on the table, and she was very enthusiastic about all sorts of ideas. These are our country. But these are steps that governments can take to protect us and fill the gaps that make our lives more dangerous, "said Weisswolf. Says.

Another issue raised is that if the state adopts the perspective that embryos are fetuses, those who fertilize embryos by IVF procedures may face restrictions on their destruction. It was that there was. Judge Samuel Alito described abortion in a leaked draft.

"I told the Vice President that I was more worried about what I call a sideswipe," said Professor Glenn Cohen of Harvard University. "The idea is that we are really aiming for abortion, but we will introduce a language that is related to in vitro fertilization and will create uncertainty."

Concerns about violence

The outlook for large-scale protests after the ruling is of concern to some White House officials. Biden has revealed that he opposes the violence surrounding the decision and recently signed a law to extend the security of the 24-hour system to the families of Supreme Court judges.

Justice Department arrested a man near Judge Brett Kavanaugh's house in Maryland earlier this month, andtried to kidnap, kill, or threaten a U.S. judge. , Security protection surrounding the High Court gained new attention

After the leak of the draft opinion, protests across the country were generally peaceful, but the capital's law enforcement authorities were latent. Prepare for safety risks. Last month, an eight-foot-high, non-expandable fence was installed around part of the Supreme Court building, and crew members installed a jersey barrier to block the street in front of the court.

In conversations with groups and supporters, the White House sees what the reaction to the ruling looks like, encouraging community leaders to lead frustration and anger into constructive action. I tried to measure.

During an early June conversation with a Los Angeles religious leader, Harris asked various groups of clergy what to preach on the weekend after the decision was made.

He said, "While the world is upside down, this is what we believe as a religious community and where we go. Mobilize as we move forward. You will be able to do it. "