Judge Clarence Thomas said Friday's groundbreakingdecision terminated federal abortion rights, as well as gay marriage and birth management. He argued that it could overturn the Supreme Court's decision to protect access to.
Conservative judges should "reconsider" other cases that fall under the court's previous "deadline" precedent, including a ruling establishing LGBTQ and contraceptive rights. I wrote that.
"In future cases, we need to revisit all of the precedents of this court's substantive legitimate process, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell," he writes.
74-year-old justice gives couples access to birth management 1965 ruling Griswoldv. Mentioned Connecticut. He also has a 2003 ruling prohibiting the state from outlawing gay sex under agreement, Lawrence vs. Texas, and a 2015 decision establishing the right to same-sex marriage. It also mentions Hodges.
Substantial legitimate process refers to the notion that people have basic rights that are not specifically established in the Constitution.
Roev. Planned Parenthood v, the case of Wade and her sister. The same legal argument was used in Casey. In 1992 he upheld the right to abortion.
In Friday's opinion, Thomas acknowledged that the Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision had no direct impact on rights other than federal abortion access.
However, he requested the court to apply the same "deadline process clause" logic to other substantive groundbreaking cases.
"There is," he wrote, "the obligation to" correct "errors" established in those precedents.
On Friday, Supreme Court has terminated almost 50 years of federal abortion rights, and Judge Samuel Alito said Dobbsv. At Jackson Women ’s Health, he expressed his opinion in favor of Mississippi.
In his opinion, Arito emphasized that this ruling would not be used to roll back any other constitutional right other than abortion.
"Our decision is constitutional so that our decision is not misunderstood or misunderstood. Emphasize that it is related to the right of abortion above. Right,
Judge Brett Kabanau said, "In this opinion, nothing casts doubt on precedents not related to abortion. It should be understood that it is not. "
Roe v. Get the latest updates to The Post following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Wade.
Kavanaugh: "I emphasize what the courts of today are saying. Overturning Roe does not mean overturning those precedents, but those We do not threaten or doubt the precedent. "
