NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Supreme Court Clarence Thomassuggested the possibility of revisiting several important judgments in the aftermath of the overthrow of the Roe v. Wade case. Thomas, who voted in the majority to overturn the groundbreaking abortion caseof
, expressed his feelings in another opinion.
Thomas's opinionmade a comparison of abortion with several other political issues that have been addressed by the Supreme Court in recent years.
"In the future, review all the precedents of this court's substantive due process, includingGriswold,Lawrence, andObergefell. Must be. "Thomas wrote in hisdue process. "Because the substantive due process decision is" obviously wrong ", [...] there is an obligation to" correct "the error established in these cases.
Live Update: SUPREME COURT ROE V. WADE DECISION
File-Judge Clarence Thomas of the Supreme Court announces the new Nathan Deal in Georgia on February 11th. A keynote speech will be given at the dedication ceremony of the Judicial Center. , 2020.(AP Photo / John Amis, File)
Griswoldv. Connecticutwas a groundbreaking case in 1965, where contraception between two married people was a privacy issue and was constitutionally protected.
Supreme Court Lawrence v. Wade Decision: Read Dobbs v. Jackson's Women's Health Ruling
Lawrence v. Texasdealt with homosexual sex between consenting parties in 2003,Obergefell v. Hodgesstepped on the same territory in 2015,gay Ruled marriage as a constitutionally protected rightFor privacy.
Thomas speculates that the overthrow ofRoeprovides a blueprint for revisiting the years-old decision he said was "obviously wrong." Did.
"After overturning these apparently false decisions, the question remains whether other constitutional provisions guarantee the myriad rights created by our substantive due process proceedings. "Let's do it," wrote Thomas.
ROEV. Abortion rights expanding in Qingzhou after the Wade incident
Friday, June 24, 2022, a professional life demonstration outside the US Supreme Court in Washington.(Valerie Plesch / Bloomberg via Getty Images)
Both the New York Times and the Washington Post on Wednesday a conservative uprising of LGBTQ rights. An opinion column was released to warn about.
Click here to get the Fox News app
The Washington Post's Alyssa Rosenberg is maintained A "more forgiving future" for American LGBTQ people who were afraid that the factions were trying to erase, Charles M. Blow of the New York Times said the rights made LGBTQ people a "cultural gay ghetto." Insisted on driving away.
Both columns warn of recent efforts in a conservative movement to challenge aspects of the LGBTQ agenda, a backlash against the new Disney / Pixar movie, Florida's "not gay" bill, And mentioned conservative opposition to drugs Queen Story Hour Event for Kids.
