USA
This article was added by the user . TheWorldNews is not responsible for the content of the platform.

Courageous Supreme Court Abortion Decision Makes History

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles.

Roev. Wade is gone. finally.  The Supreme Court met at that moment, made history, and corrected the worst constitutional distortions of living memory. 

 Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Agency overturned Roe , draft opinion of Judge Samuel Alito Leak shameful tries to poison the well , never sees the sunlight, at least is instead of Majority of the court Opinion. More than seven weeks of

 brought brave threats tactics as well as attempted murder And violence extended to crisis pregnancy centers and churches.

RIP ROE: The Supreme Court's decision on abortion sets the stage for what the Pro Life Group will do next

These threats and violence have failed. A majority of the courts ruled that these judges are given the courage to withstand the intense pressure of targeting at . Should be. Arito's opinion is largely larger than the previous draft , except to address the for and against opinions of other judges. It can't be different .

Crowds outside the Supreme Court reacting to the Dobbs ruling.

Outside the Supreme Court in response to Dobbs' decision crowd. (Joshua Comins / Fox News)

The majority of , are not shy about overturning false case law .. conduct. Roe and Caseyv. PlannedParenthood, the 1992 decision that reaffirmed the right to abortion, clearly states that was established by by in 1973. } Roe, "must be dismissed. The Constitution does not mention abortion and such rights are not implicitly protected by any constitutional provision." 

Arito's opinion calls Roe "extremely wrong from the beginning", with "very weak" reasoning and "damaging" consequences. " 

SUPREME COURT DECISION RESTORES CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES

Dobbs , isMississippi A law prohibiting abortionin 15 weeks, except for emergency illness and severe fetal abnormalities. The Mississippi 15-week limit is "viability" It is much faster than the criteria established by Casey, which limited the later abortion limit to . The line of feasibility has changed with technological advances, but it's still less than 15 weeks. 

The court did not mention when the state should begin to protect prenatal life. 238} Roe and the subsequent decision are whitened: "Abortion is what those decisions call" potential life ", and in this case the law in question is" fetal ". Destroy what we consider to be the life of a "human".

Arito's Opinion Note 30 An important precedent has been overturned in our history. 

Arito's Opinion Note 30 An important precedent has been overturned in our history. Among the most famous examples, Brown v. Board of Education (1954) is Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) for "separate but equal". Overturned the doctrine. A decision that lasted 58 years – much longer than Roe.

And Casey itself is often not considered an abortion, but in fact is Roe replaces the alleged reason for justifying abortion as a federal constitutional right with , a new legal test known as the "excessive burden" standard. Partially by creating. 

 Thirty years after Casey was decided, 's excessive burden criteria enact legislatures that the legislature considers to be . It has prevented that from the right to abortion is burdened. This ambiguous standard left a long way for confused judges to reach conclusions contradictory regarding abortion regulations in the Supreme Court itself as well as in the lower courts.

Justice Samuel Alito joins his colleagues for the Supreme Court's group portrait in Washington, April 23, 2021.

Judge Samuel Alito is a group of Supreme Court A portrait of Washington joining a colleague for April 23, 2021.(Erin Schaff / The New York Times via AP, Pool, File)

And During Casey, evoking the "legitimacy" of the court, Arito called on the country to "end the division of the country" by accepting a watered-down version of judicial imperialism on the issue of abortion, "as it became more and more apparent in the meantime, 261} Casey did not achieve that goal. "

Click here to get the Opinion Newsletter

Judge Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Cagan read as , as in the precedent they claimed, and Wrote a joint dissenting to read raw appeals to legitimacy. This includes the exaggerated claim that currently "women do not have the right to speak." is the ability judicially imposed to abort as if had the only important right to .

Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer holds up a copy of the U.S. Constitution as he announces he will retire at the end of the court's current term, at the White House, Jan. 27, 2022.

Judge Stephen Breyer of the Supreme Court said the US Constitution , He announced at the end of his current term that he would retire at the White House on January 27, 2022.(Reuters / Kevin Lamarck)

Furthermore, the opposition is the law of Roe No serious effort has been made to disagree with the majority's point on the rationale. First instance. Their allegations correspond to appealing for the court's protracted judicial tort on the theme of abortion . policy. Such a brave fusion of policy preferences and constitutional interpretation undermines the rule of law.

Click here to get the Fox News app

Courtroom Dobbs Decision, We Now is Roe's False History, Casey's Court's "Legitimacy" You can say goodbye to pretending to be exaggerated about "instead of admitting mistakes, and in both cases , the fetus has no right to be allowed to protect people. Pretending to be.

Now, through elected representatives, people are free to legislate on this disputed topic. Finally, the court has taken up from the people. The problem has now been returned to them.

Click here to read more about Carrie Campbell Severino 

Carrie Campbell Severino is the Secretary of Justice Crisis Network.