Ketangi Brown Jackson vowed that SCOTUS will issue major decisions on climate and immigration

Thursday's Supreme Court's opinion on EPA The biggest point fromis Kirti Datla, a lawyer for Earthjustice, a non-profit organization focused on climate litigation, saying that Justice did exactly what the GOP states and coal companies wanted. Mr. says.

"The EPA still has room to do what the court did not [arbitrage]. Consider the legislation, think about what it allows, and this incredibly huge amount. We will issue regulations to address the sources of emissions. An urgent issue, "Datra told CNN.

However, Datra broadly stated that the case paved the way for Republican-led states and fossil fuel companies to challenge current and future EPA regulations on global warming emissions.

This opinion also creates a great deal of uncertainty about what the EPA can and cannot do, and what the Supreme Court considers to be the so-called major issue, said Executive Director Carrie Jenks. rice field. Harbor Draw School Environment&Overview of the Energy Law Program.

The court has reduced the power of government agencies by invoking the principle of key questions. This is a ruling that affects the federal government's authority to regulate other areas of climate policy, as well as the regulation of the Internet and worker safety. The biggest issue is that the parliament itself should decide, not an agency like the EPA.

"What's the big thing because the court says you can't do big things without the parliament speaking?" Jenks told CNN. "This doctrine is just beginning to emerge from the court. This doctrine is beginning to become clearer. I think they will continue to use the doctrine of the main question to oppose the EPA's rulemaking."

President Byden says the Environmental Protection Agency'swill curbthe ability of the Environmental Protection Agency to broadly regulate carbon emissions . Called for a Supreme Court decision. Existing power plant "Another catastrophic decision aimed at retreating our country".

The court's decision represents a major defeat for the Biden administration's attempts to reduce emissions at the moment scientists are alerting to the accelerating pace of global warming.

In a statement, the president said in a statement that the ruling would undermine the country's ability to combat climate change, and the legal team would work with the Ministry of Justice to consider the decision and "find a way to protect public health." I instructed him to do so. "

"We cannot and do not ignore the dangers to public health and the threat of existence that the climate crisis poses. Science is what we all see for ourselves." Make sure you have it, endangering our lives and livelihoods. "

Some situations: According to the EPA, about 25% of global warming greenhouse gas emissions worldwide and in the United States come from power generation. And coal, the dirtiest fossil fuel, powers about 20% of US electricity.

Emissions from electricity production increasedfor the first time since 2014. This is mainly due to the use of coal.

The surge in fossil fuel use is worrisome as well as Byden's climate goals. The president promised to cut US emissions in half by 2030, in the first few months after his inauguration — as well as the planet.

Legislators and organizations, the new Supreme Court Ketangi Brown Jackson as the first black woman justice They shared their reaction to being sworn in.

House Speaker Nancy Peroshi:

Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren:

New Jersey Senator Corey Booker:

Black Lives Matter:

Black Voters Matter:

CNN legal analyst Joan Biskupic said that Ketanji Brown Jackson's historic confirmation and subsequent Thursday pledge was  {131. } Said not to do. Changing the Supreme Court's ideological balance will bring a fresh perspective to the court.

"She also has this very unique experience as a former judge and a former federal public advocate. Therefore. Different attitudes around Private table of justice, "she added.

Legal analysts said they remembered what Judge John Roberts said in these cases.

"Fresh justice brings a behind-the-scenes operation of , a series of fresh ideas about about the incident, which is for everyone. Probably just change to his or her lens is a bit a bit, "said the analyst.

"His special perspective and his ability to talk around 's private conference table are actually different from . In a way that made them think. He may have changed the vote, but , at least the argument of has changed. So I think all of this will have an impact and bring about a new Supreme Court, "she added.

Summer is normal , Justice to escape Washington, the next term begins in a short three months, and Dockett has a serious incident.

On the first day of his term, Ketangi Brown Jackson took a seat reserved for the youngest justice in the court and had federal jurisdiction over the wetlands protected under clean water law. Listen to incidents that may limit.

The next day, they heard about the change of constituency from Alabama and outlined the main provisions of the Voting Rights Act  banning discriminatory voting practices. I will explore. Based on race.

Liberals remember the words of the late Judge Ruthbader Ginsburg in 2013, when the court eradicated another provision of the Voting Rights Act that led to the "infamous RBG" nickname. At the time, Ginsburg wrote in that throwing away protection was similar to "throwing away an umbrella in a storm because it wasn't wet."

Two positive action cases that challenge admission policies at Harvard and North Carolina University are not yet planned. Perhaps because he was working on Harvard's supervisory board, Jackson said at a confirmation hearing that he would withdraw from the Harvard conflict. But she can dominate the North Carolina challenge.

The court also deals with cases involving web designers who do not work with same-sex couples because they challenge same-sex marriage. This is a sequel to the 2018 controversy in which the court upheld a Colorado bakery that refused to make cakes for same-sex weddings. The final opinion in that case was that was carefully adjusted to the immediate controversy and had no national implications. New cases can have more drastic results.

All this will work, as the court continues to try to determine who leaked the draft opinion on the misconduct this term one month before the official announcement. The move caused paranoia in the High Court by breaking the norms of the High Court, and judges questioned who in it or its clerk attempted to undermine the legitimacy of the court.

Read moreHere

Kimberly Mutcherson, co-departmental director and professor of the Rutgers Law School, said the Supreme Court's ideology would not change with the addition of new justice. Ketangi Brown Jackson, who puts the first black woman on the bench, brings a new perspective.

She said it was important to have different voices in the room when a true decision was made for all Americans.

"It doesn't necessarily change the way votes, but at least changes the way we think about some issues," she said.

CNN analyst and Supreme Court biography writer Joan Biskupic agreed that Jackson's position in court would make a big difference in "dynamics around the table." She compared it to the way Judge Sandra Day O'Connor talked about the views brought to court by Judge Sirgood Marshall, the first black judge.

She said Jackson brings several different perspectives to the table — her race, her age, and her career as a federal public advocate.

"She has almost the same kind of background that Stephen Breyer does with respect to 's education and experience. They are both justice officers. , Both very prestigious degrees — but she has this important demographic difference, she is 51 years old years old. Stephen Breyer I'm 83 years old, so I'm going to bring that too, "said Biscpick.

The unified Senate Democratic Caucus and three Republican Senators went to the US Supreme Court in April I voted to confirm Ketangi Brown Jackson.

Main Senator Susan Collins, Mitt Romney of Utah, and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska broke the party boundaries and voted in favor of Jackson.

Collins announced their support for Jackson in a March statement, "having the experience, qualifications and integrity to serve" on the bench. Said.

Romney tweeted his intention to confirm Jackson. Of excellence and perfection.

Murkowski , in a statement, her support "relies on refusing to politicize the corrosive politics of the Supreme Court candidate review process." Said.

Last year, three Republican Senators, including both Collins and Murkowski, voted to confirm that Jackson would fill the seats of the Court of Appeals. The third vote came from Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina. Despite being a pre-hearing supporter, he is a very critical opponent of Jackson's confirmation  .

After Judge Stephen Breyer retired today, Jackson made the history of being sworn in court as the first black woman in 233 years of history.

Retiring Supreme Court Judge Stephen Breyer praised the new judge, Ketangi Brown Jackson, as "sympathetic, thoughtful, and consensus."

In his statement, he states: For the justice of my companion. They acquire sympathetic, thoughtful, and supportive colleagues. I am happy with America. Ketangi interprets the law wisely and fairly and helps the law work better for the Americans who serve it. Congratulations Ketangi Brown Jackson. "