USA
This article was added by the user . TheWorldNews is not responsible for the content of the platform.

MSNBC's Chris Hayes: "Tough Break" ridiculed by the Supreme Court's claim that it is now a "threat to the planet"

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

MSNBC anchor Chris Hayes was one of several progressive social media users who criticized the Supreme Court's EPA decision on Thursday.

Hayes specifically argued that the Supreme Court's ruling on theWest Virginia v. EPA casenow poses a "threat to the planet."

"There is a lack of words to explain this court, but above all, it is now a threat to the planet," Hayes tweeted.

A week before June 22, the Republican Party suggested that the Republican Party represented "Continuing Threats to the Republic" in his show "All In". Reflected Haze's comment.

The Supreme Court is seen Wednesday, June 29, 2022, in Washington.

The Supreme Court will meet on Wednesday, June 29, 2022. You can see it in Washington. (AP Photo / Jacquelyn Martin)

'Dear Supreme Court, thank you for anything:'DEMS and media at the High Court EPA

The Supreme Court ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency could no longer issue regulations to the industry without parliamentary approval. This decision was a major limitation on the authority of the executive body and was seen as a blow to the ongoing climate change led by the Biden administration.

Some people on Twitter have specifically criticized Hayes as an extreme reaction to limiting government overkill.

Senior Federalist Editor David Harsany replied, "I'm sorry that people can vote for these things. It's a tough break."

Townhall.com columnist Kurt Schlichter joked, "Your sorrow pleases me. I blaspheme your angry weather goddess." 

"MSNBC's Chris Hayes has a big problem in sustaining his life and stopping big government overkill," said Steve Guest, adviser to Ted Cruz. writing.

National Review writer Charles C.W. Cooke wrote a correction to Haze's tweet.

Political critic Noam Bloom tweeted, "Rather than giving bureaucratic control to unelected bureaucrats, we should enact laws on things."

FILE - By a 6-3 vote, with conservatives in the majority, the court said that the Clean Air Act does not give the Environmental Protection Agency broad authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants that contribute to global warming. 

File-6-3 votes, majority of conservatives The Court said the Clean Air Act does not give the Environmental Protection Agency broad authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants that contribute to global warming.  ((AP Photo / Rick Bowmer, File))

Others on MSNBC, CNN, and EPA rulings The Supreme Court, LAMENT BIDEN ADMINISTRATION LOSS

Democrats have similarly begun to use extreme language to criticize the Supreme Court's ruling. 

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, D-N.Y. Tweeted that thedecision was "catastrophic" and theSenate needed to remove the filibuster. planet. "

Senate leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., Also said that he had decided to" cause more unnecessary death, "" MAGA, the oppressive, radical Supreme Court. " Attacked.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) logo is displayed on a door at its headquarters on March 16, 2017 in Washington, DC. 

US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) logo displayed Will be on March 16, 2017, at the door of the Washington, DC headquarters.  (Justin Sullivan / Getty Images)

Click here to get the FOX News app

The West Virginia v. EPA decision was one of the final decisions issued by the Supreme Court this term.

Lindsay Kornick is Deputy Editor-in-Chief of FoxNews Digital. Story tips can be sent to lindsay.kornick @ fox.com and Twitter (@lmkornick).