Abortion protesters are the Supreme Court Washington Court Gathering Outside, Friday, June 24, 2022. The Supreme Court has terminated its constitutional protection against abortion, which has been in place for nearly 50 years. This is a conservative majority decision to overturn the court's groundbreaking abortion case. ((AP Photo / Jose Luis Magana))
NEWNow you can listen to Fox News articles. I can do it.
MSNBC Opinion Columnist Hayes Brown wrote a column condemning the latest term of the Supreme Courtand allegedly assaulted American rights, with Democrats in parliament in the judiciary. He accused him of not doing enough to stop him.
Brown opened a column on Friday, stating that "the Supreme Court ended its term on Thursday and made a series of decisions that threatened the privacy, health and well-being of Americans through casual atrocities." .. "Democrats are not responding with the necessary anger and urgency in the face of this attack on the rights and privileges of their members," he added.
The columnist was at least "a government of national and state representatives" by Framer. "
" The administration should have been feared and detained. In comparison, the judiciary is in the future. In drafting the Federalist Papers, Alexander Hamilton considered the court "lowest risk". "Political rights of the Constitution," Brown explained.
SUPREME COURT'S EPA DECISION SPARKS 5 WACKY MEDIA MELTDOWNS
The Chamber of Commerce of the House of Representatives. MSNBC columnists have accused Congress of not taking steps to detain the Supreme Court. (AP Photo / J. Scott Applewhite)
"What I saw this term was a court that decided to prove that Hamilton was wrong," he added. Democrats even challenge the third branch.
The columnist criticized the legislature for only "confirming justice with the judge" and "more appropriate as a check of theadministrative government's power. Should be seen in. " Nominate members to the court, not the judge's check.
"The Constitution gives Congress greater freedom to deal with the functioning of federal courts and respond to Supreme Court decisions," he said, with government agencies leaning towards that role. It suggests that there is no such thing.
For example, Brown argues that Congress is within the authority to respond to thecourt's EPA decisionfrom Thursday, stating: The law explicitly states, "Yes, the EPA has this authority." But it dropped the ball.
However, he said, "But on Thursday, the Supreme Court used the so-called main question doctrine, which was seemingly randomly used to break the regulation. You can. "
File-Coal-fired power generation A big wave of steam from the power plant on November 18, 2021, in Craig, Colorado. The Supreme Court on Thursday, June 30, 2022 restricted how the country's major air pollution control laws could be used to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from power plants. In a 6-3 vote with a majority of conservatives, the Court said the Clean Air Act does not give the Environmental Protection Agency broad authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants that contribute to global warming. rice field. ((AP Photo / Rick Bowmer, File))
But that wasn't the case. "There was no move from lawmakers to force the courts to clarify their doctrine or to develop words to assert their ability to delegate authority to authorities in future bills," Brown added.
Brown said that the Supreme Court's decision in the Dobbs v. Jackson case overturned the Roe v. Wade case "congress will pass federal law that guarantees such access. It doesn't interfere, "he added.
Biden and various Democrats have developed strategies on how to systematize the right to abortion into federal law, but Biden also mentioned changing filibuster.They haven't found a practical way to enact it.
The Supreme Court and the conservative "power of hatred" are trying to undo the progress of the 1960s: L.A. TIMES COLUMN
Anyway, Brown mentioned other tactics that Congress didn't use like the impeachment of judges in court. "The first impeachment is rarely used against judges in the Supreme Court more than the president. Even the impeachment investigation in the House of Representatives has no coordinated call," he wrote.
"The 27th Constitutional Amendment has not occurred since the 27th amendment, which prevented Congress from raising salaries, was ratified in the early 1990s," Brown added. .. He then said that the impeachment alternative, an effort to expand the courts, "did not go anywhere in either parliament."
The author also accused Congress of not supporting Democrat Ro Khanna and enacted a new law limiting the appointment of Supreme Court judges to 18 years. "If the Democrats were guilty of serious negligence in checking the Supreme Court, the GOP engaged in deliberate negligence."
"This unnecessary, voluntary detention is power. Allowed steadily to flow away. Brown added that Congress's "laziness does not hold the Supreme Court accountable," and these negligent people "rather than changing ambitious yields in the world." I want to see it burn. "
The members of the Supreme Court are Washington, 2021 4 23rd of March. From the left, Deputy Judge Samuel Alito, Deputy Judge Clarence Thomas, and Chief Justy are seated. ce John Roberts, Deputy Judge Stephen Breyer, Judge Sonia Sotomayor, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Judge Elena Kagan, Judge Neil Gorsuch, Judge Amy Connie Barrett from the left. The Supreme Court has terminated its constitutional protection against abortion, which has been in place for nearly 50 years (Erin Schaff / The New York Times via AP, Pool, File)
Click here to get the FOX News app
