USA

This article was added by the user . TheWorldNews is not responsible for the content of the platform.

Politico's reporter, who broke the story of the Roe v. Wade case, gives some advice to the newsroom.

Politico's story was right.

Josh Garstein, who co-signed theearthquake scooplast month on a court's leak of opinion about abortion, learns that an official Supreme Court decision could overturn Law. I got up on Friday and was online. v. Wade may be inherited. He didn't think the ruling was likely until next week, but he prepared iced tea (chosen a decaffeinated drink), logged on to Zoom Call from home with the editor at 10am, and logged on to Zoom Call from home. The court refreshment has begun. A website to check what kind of opinions will be announced.

When the court ruled Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Agency at 10:10 am, "we have just begun preparations," Gerstein told me. May 2 Story Telegram.

Gerstein described Friday as "crazy and chaotic." I'm sure it applies to most news rooms as journalists worked to cover the decision and explain exactly what it meant to viewers across the country.

Can you find out the source of POLITICO?

Since Politico's scoop, speculation about leakers and possible motives for leaks has swirled. The number one question Garstein received on Friday was what he believed was the effect of the leak. "It's a little difficult to say," he admitted.

After the official ruling came out, when Gerstein asked if he spoke to the source of the leaked opinion, he refused to answer. But he suggested that one day we could all know who the source was. When I asked Gerstein if the person would eventually put himself out, he said, "I don't think I can answer it directly, but in most situations that part of the story is told. I think most of these are story types, watergates or whatever you have. But we will see, "Gerstein, as a reporter," history is more informative. We are moving in the direction of coming, "he added.

"Too much credit" or inadequate.

Gerstein is not only one of the two reporters who reported the news that the court was set to overturn Roe (the other reporter was Alexander Ward), as well. industry. So I asked him what the media covering this moment of crustal movement could improve.

Garstein believes the news media is over-focusing on Judge Clarence Thomas'ssupportive opinionand revisits the court with other groundbreaking cases. He said he was asking. "Just because liberal judges say this ruling means same-sex marriage or contraception (their rights are about to be deprived), or advocacy groups say it is the most direct fallout. It doesn't tend to mean that, "Gelstein said. "I think the press is a little too confident about that kind of thing, but it's somewhat speculative," Gerstein said instead, "there's a lot more concrete," the press notes. Insisted that it could be done. Down the road. "

When I asked Jeffrey Tobin, CNN's chief legal analyst, about this, he said it was a" fair point "and" I should say a lot about the impact of Dobbs itself. " I certainly agree. " But Mr. Tubin said, "Thomas is a conservative majority senior member of the court. His clear support for overturning these cases is definitely worth the press. Only liberals are falling. That would be one thing, but Thomas claims. "

" I've spent my entire career in journalism covering Roe's legacy, "Toobin said. Added to. "This has always been the biggest issue in the Supreme Court. At one level, the dispute over Roe is over, but the proceedings from Dobbs will continue to grow, as will Bruen and gun control. All legal proceedings on books will be challenged. "

Press Note

Most major press agencies have taken up breaking news, like the SCOTUS decision. We are in the process of distributing. CNN viewers were able to see that it was happening in real time. At 10:10 am, Jim Skiat said he had been sentenced and waited for the DC News Room to evaluate his remarks. Jeffrey Toobin, Chief Legal Analyst, who was already at the anchor desk in the 1/6 hearing segment, set up a news table saying it was "flashbulb memory." Country. Then, at 10:12, Jessica Schneider reported the decision and the press began.

>> Fox News disconnected the segment with Reince Priebus to break the news, and Shannon Dream reported from outside the court.

>> MSNBC initially tinkered with the news by chopping up the already-in-progress NBC special report with a delay. But since then, the network has been breaking news without commercials for four hours in a row.

Fox Filter

Prime time coverage from Fox was exactly what you would expect from a right-wing channel. Organizers portrayed anti-abortion activists as part of a country under attack from "radical" liberals. The four banners, aired at 7 pm and 8 pm, actually show the duration of the press.

>> "RADICALS SWARM HOME OF CLARENCE THOMAS"

>>"Pro-life movement targeted by the far left"

>>"ROE is dead. Threatening the" night of anger ""

>> "ROEISDEAD: Just as abortion is angry, people in professional life weep for joy. Shout "

-Doris Truing writes about" how to ensure diversity "for news organizations. Abortion reporting perspective. (Pointer)

-Shefari Rusla: "I want to focus on the political battle, but in essence, the new reality of access to abortion is health care." It's about health fairness. "(Center for Health Journalism)

-Jenna Sherman:" Probably no medical treatment is as erroneous as abortion, social media And search engine companies are too stagnant in their efforts to stop the spread. ”(Scientific American)

-Kate Zernike said on Friday's" split screen He writes that "reaction" reflects "polarized nations: joy and relief on the one hand, anger and sadness on the other." other. "(NYT)

-Religious News Service: Friday's opinion is," Reshaping American society and adding to the traditional sexual and sexual values they support. " It's the best result of the conservative Christian willingness to get closer. "(RNS)

-CNN's Joan Biscpic:" This is America's new Supreme Court and swift. And rejected Judge John Roberts' gradualism. "(CNN)

--Emily Jordan:" If you were to write an article about abortion, be objective. I don't think I couldn't cover it. Only those who are isolated from the problem are approaching a journalistic environment that covers them. "(YR)

-Ben Marin : "Politico's Law vs. Wade case is law." (NYT)

-Kelly Hooper said, "What's from Judge Arito's draft opinion to Law's final decision?" Has it changed? " (Politico)

Media company response

Media giants say with employees that access to abortion will continue to be covered Guarantee to the family.

>> Disney, which owns ABC News, said that"communicate directly" with employees and the company "provides access to assisted reproductive technology regardless. We are still committed to doing so. " Where they live.

>>Warner Bros owns the CNN. "We are committed to providing employees across the country with access to consistent and comprehensive healthcare services," said Discovery, "immediately expanding healthcare." A privilege option to cover the transportation costs of employees and their families who need to travel to access abortion and assisted reproductive technology.

>> Comcast, which owns NBC News and MSNBC, says that travel for abortion services is the largest for employees when they need to travel for eligible medical services. He said he was eligible for the benefit of receiving $ 4,000.

>>Vox Media CEO Jim Bankoffsaid thedecision "has a serious negative impact on the autonomy and health of women and all pregnant women." Said. Bankoff said Vox "continues to support employees seeking access to critical health care, including abortion."

>>Condé Nast CEO Roger Lynchsent an email tostaff stating that the company would refund the trip to those in need of an abortion. I did.

>> BuzzFeed said it would pay employees who need to travel for an abortion. CEO Jonah Perettivowed tothat "the process in this regard is completely confidential."

Newsroom repeats social guidelines

>>Axiostells employees"Additional "We continue to seek health care," he said, "resources," and "difficult demands that all staff refrain from taking a political position in public." "We know that this is a lot to ask when we feel that our identity and the most sacred values are being beaten, but our public position on political topics is us. May undermine confidence in journalism. "

>> NYT remindsstaff of the company's social media policies: I did. , It can undermine the credibility of the entire news room.

>> Gannettsent a note to the staffThe company "is actively working with providers to ensure continued profits under the new regulations." We are cooperating with each other. " "Journalists need to be careful about what they post on social media," he said in a memo. "As journalists, we are making sacrifices for our profession. Public position on abortion Most Major newsrooms prohibit staff from taking certain aspects of political issues. The rationale that awareness of bias can undermine the credibility of outlets. But in general, newsrooms are journalists. It gives you the freedom to talk about specific issues related to human or civil rights. Some journalists are now wondering if abortion falls into the latter category. Some news Given the guidance that the room sent staff on Friday, the answer seems no.

There is also a bigger debate about the concept of objectiveness. "I hope the industry is willing to declare. "Journalist is a human"Wesley Raleigh tweeted"We have prejudice and experience, and humanity enriches our journalism. Like all humans, ours. Journalists sometimes have private, semi-public, public platforms and their humanity at the venue. "Raleigh said there is a difference between" perception of objectiveness "and" objectiveness of work / process. "

Congressmen want the FTC to investigate Apple and Google

A group of US lawmakers, including Senator Elizabeth Warren and Cory Booker, said I wrote FTC Chairman Lina Khan on Friday. 159} said government agencies need to investigate Apple and Googleabout the data they collect about consumers. "Data brokers sell, license and share the location of people who already visit abortion providers to those who have credit cards. State prosecutors who make abortion illegal will soon be those who have visited the abortion. You will be able to obtain a guarantee of location information. Abortion provider. "

"Private actors also provide incentives by state bounty law to hunt down women who have had or are seeking an abortion by accessing location information through a shaded data broker. "It will be done," added the lawmaker. "The FTC needs to investigate Apple and Google's role in transforming online advertising into a powerful surveillance system that encourages and promotes the unlimited collection and continued sale of American personal data."

When talking to Gerstein, he also said that this "extended to social media." "This will be really confusing for tech and social media companies," Garstein said. He said there would definitely be efforts in these states to "use those techniques to chase people evading the law" from local prosecutors and police in the Red States. "It's going to be a big, big problem," Garstein warned. So far, it's unclear how Big Tech will react.